Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

JohnnyRingo

(20,660 posts)
13. Wouldn't he have to be found guilty of a crime first?
Mon Jun 4, 2018, 11:14 AM
Jun 2018

I'm no lawyer, but neither is the president. I would think he could only pardon himself of crimes if he's convicted of one (or more). Otherwise, it's just an official declaration of innocence, something everyone facing charges does.

Once found guilty, a president may no longer have the ability to pardon anyone, if he's rightly unseated. I weary of making the same tired comparison, but imagine if Bill Clinton pardoned himself of lying under oath.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»DOJ Website : President c...»Reply #13