Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

yardwork

(69,364 posts)

6. It's a "narrow" decision because of the case, not the number of votes.

Reply to jodymarie aimee (Original post)

Mon Jun 4, 2018, 12:20 PM

Jun 2018

The decision is not broadly applicable to other cases. The Supreme Court didn't roll back gay rights. They decided that there were issues with this particular case.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

11 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Why are they calling 7-2 decision Narrow? [View all] jodymarie aimee Jun 2018 OP

It's not the 7-2 part that's narrow Blue_Adept Jun 2018 #1

I thought that was odd, too. Hong Kong Cavalier Jun 2018 #2

It's not the vote that was narrow, it was the decision... Wounded Bear Jun 2018 #3

'Justice Anthony M. Kennedy, writing for the majority in the 7-2 decision, relied on narrow grounds, elleng Jun 2018 #4

Assume because of how it was applied mvd Jun 2018 #5

It's a "narrow" decision because of the case, not the number of votes. yardwork Jun 2018 #6

It's not the vote count, it's what the ruling said Lee-Lee Jun 2018 #7

Thanks for clearing it up for me jodymarie aimee Jun 2018 #8

The scope of the decision is narrow. It applies only to this baker due OliverQ Jun 2018 #9

There's a lot of poor reporting going around. apnu Jun 2018 #11

They should have clarified the parameters were narrow, and not all inclusive still_one Jun 2018 #10