Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

salvorhardin

(9,995 posts)
6. That's not true for Indiana
Fri Aug 3, 2012, 10:45 PM
Aug 2012

Last edited Sat Aug 4, 2012, 12:25 AM - Edit history (1)

IC 26-1-3.1-305 Defenses and claims in recoupment
    Sec. 305. (a) Except as otherwise provided in this section, the right to enforce the obligation of a party to pay an instrument is subject to the following:
      (1) a defense of the obligor based on:
            (A) infancy of the obligor to the extent it is a defense to a simple contract;
Source: http://www.in.gov/legislative/ic/code/title26/ar1/ch3.1.html


IC 1-1-4-5 Definitions applicable to construction of all Indiana statutes
   Sec. 5. The following definitions apply to the construction of all Indiana statutes, unless the construction is plainly repugnant to the intent of the general assembly or of the context of the statute:
        (1) "Adult", "of full age", and "person in his majority" mean a person at least eighteen (18) years of age.

..

        (8) "Infant" or "minor" means a person less than eighteen (18) years of age.
Source: http://www.in.gov/legislative/ic/code/title1/ar1/ch4.html


Do you have a primary source that says otherwise?

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»How can a 16 year old sig...»Reply #6