Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Chik-fil-a story: please clear some things up for me. [View all]NYC_SKP
(68,644 posts)31. None of which I am aware, however there are outstanding examples of discrimination.
I did a few searches and didn't come up with any links, sorry. It might be that it's been done but not documented, or I can't search very effectively.
But if we set aside the contributions aspect and look instead at cases of (alleged) discrimination, there would IMHO be grounds for a municipality like SF to say fuck off with your application for a business license.
And if they didn't do it overtly, they could sure as hell do it covertly.
Small governments and large work (or don't work) with various business entities and figures largely around personalities and attitudes. Laws and rules actually take a back seat in our country. And that's nothing new.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
47 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Do you remember Apartheid? Did you know that cities and counties divested for similar reasons?
NYC_SKP
Aug 2012
#12
I think it's within the law for a community to prevent Chick a Fil from doing business there.
NYC_SKP
Aug 2012
#18
None of which I am aware, however there are outstanding examples of discrimination.
NYC_SKP
Aug 2012
#31
"And if they didn't do it overtly, they could sure as hell do it covertly."
ithinkmyliverhurts
Aug 2012
#36
I complete agree. I'm not against a politician saying something about such a business
hughee99
Aug 2012
#47
Because they enact their policies illegally (assuming they are business owners).
ithinkmyliverhurts
Aug 2012
#7
So when money is involved -i.e. a business- free speech rights are defended to the utmost.
randome
Aug 2012
#37
The bigoted speech was just the trigger for wider exposure of the donation of company
TalkingDog
Aug 2012
#8
For the record, SF Mayor did not say that Chick-fil-a would not be allowed in the city...
Luminous Animal
Aug 2012
#13
I'm heading off to my favorite bar but I'll happily supply links in the AM.
Luminous Animal
Aug 2012
#16