unbelievably frustrating shopping experience at Lowe's yesterday

[AnotherMcIntosh]

205. 1. You didn't denigrate teabaggers. You denigrated a minimum-wage worker who allegedly "rolled his

eyes," according to the OP, by calling him a teabagger. Even if the OP's allegation regarding the alleged "rolled eyes" is true, you have no factual basis for calling the minimum-wage worker a teabagger. None.

2. You didn't educate anyone regarding regarding an alleged "blind support of a returning troll," and you certainly didn't educate me regarding an alleged "blind support of a returning troll." I simply supported a poster whose alleged status (according to you) may or may not be "a returning troll." All that is known according to his profile is that with respect to him: "Posting privileges revoked." There is nothing to support your claim that he is a "troll" or a "returning troll."

I did not support a "troll" or a "returning troll." I supported a voice of reason over a name caller. You began this sub-string when (a) you went beyond the origional post by the OP and called the minimum-wage worker a "lunkhead Teabagger" and (b) you said, "But he's a Teabagger and there is no fixing stupid."

The new poster whose "Posting privileges" are now revoked for some unknown reason challenged those factually unsupported statements, and apparently for irony referred to your word "stupid" misspelled "stupidity" by saying,

I think stoopidity is best defined by those who make snap judgments based on diddly-squat and have biases which color every encounter they have.

There's no fixing that type, 99 Forever

There is nothing to indicate from his words that he is a "troll," a "returning troll," or a teabagger, or any other name that you might want to call him.

3. Your representation that the American minimum-wage worker, a "salesguy," believes "that the death of manufacturing in our Nation is no big deal" is not supported by the facts. There are no objective facts to support an allegation that he holds such a belief.

4. You said, "I won't be posing back to you anymore." (I think that you meant to say "posting".)

Is that a promise? Somehow, I don't believe you. Excuse me, but I think that is as untruthful as your calling the minimum-wage worker a teabagger (a "lunkhead Teabagger&quot . And I think that it is as untruthful as your calling the new poster a troll (a "returning troll&quot . I also think that it is as untruthful as your factually-deficient personal attacks on me and your false claim that I have provided "blind support of a returning troll."

If you truly don't want to post back anymore, then you can easily refrain from doing so.