Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

JackRiddler

(24,979 posts)
24. An honest statement of divide and conquer, at least.
Mon Jan 2, 2012, 11:51 PM
Jan 2012

It's a degenerately instrumental view of politics to set up an unnecessary and bogus competition between inalienable human rights and declare that some (such as those protected by the habeas corpus clause and the 4th, 5th and 6th amendments) are dispensable, as long as others you "value" more highly are protected. In this you're acknowledging to be no different than what you accuse Ron Paul of doing (valuing only those rights that are important to him and his group or class).

I value reproductive rights as derived from the 9th amendment, and all civil rights -- those protected by the 13th, 14th and 15th amendments as well as those protected by the original Constitution and the Bill of Rights, as well as those derived since then through case law and after the many struggles and sacrifices of the people for equality and justice in social and economic spheres.

Whereas, just as you accuse of Ron Paul (more or less correctly), you seem to value those rights that seem vital to your political goals, and have now suggested you don't care who is trampled if you don't think their rights are important to those goals.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Keep counting those torches izquierdista Jan 2012 #1
Civil libertarianism is a pretty big tendency within the ACLU. Selatius Jan 2012 #2
You are exactly right. The ACLU has a narrow focus. Ron Paul is batshit nuts on everything else. banned from Kos Jan 2012 #6
Forget ProSense Jan 2012 #11
So they're comparing Obama to the lies the others peddle? FarLeftFist Jan 2012 #32
Not to mention if he tried, Congress would stop him. TheWraith Jan 2012 #47
3 torches for hating all of humanity except rich white males. 5 torches for bat-shittery... FarLeftFist Jan 2012 #3
Pals around with Politicalboi Jan 2012 #4
OMG! I usually love the ACLU, but they BLAME O because johnaries Jan 2012 #5
Obama is keeping Gitmo in business via Executive Order, Its all on him... IamK Jan 2012 #15
Some attorney's like Yoo have twisted words to death.... midnight Jan 2012 #46
No. He didn't do every thing he could... Luminous Animal Jan 2012 #16
the ACLU is an embarrassment... how they survive nobody knows.... IamK Jan 2012 #7
Based on what?? Logical Jan 2012 #14
Fascinating ProSense Jan 2012 #8
In fairness, Obama has been tough on Immigration cthulu2016 Jan 2012 #23
Well, ProSense Jan 2012 #25
The old conundrum, where both law and lawlessness threaten liberty bhikkhu Jan 2012 #9
The way I read it, Gary Johnson is #1, Paul #2, Obama #3 Renew Deal Jan 2012 #10
you are correct. I goofed by reading the body of text I quoted. n/t banned from Kos Jan 2012 #12
You can edit. n/t ProSense Jan 2012 #20
thanks, somehow I thought titles were not edited. banned from Kos Jan 2012 #22
You can edit the headline. cthulu2016 Jan 2012 #21
How is Ron Paul first, if Gary Johnson scored higher? beyurslf Jan 2012 #13
It's not about who they like. JackRiddler Jan 2012 #17
It's ProSense Jan 2012 #18
An honest statement of divide and conquer, at least. JackRiddler Jan 2012 #24
Hmmmm? ProSense Jan 2012 #28
Carry on. JackRiddler Jan 2012 #29
I ProSense Jan 2012 #30
"Strawmen arguments," that's hilarious. It's pretty much all you do. JackRiddler Jan 2012 #31
Maybe ProSense Jan 2012 #35
This is exactly how Iraq war supporters argued. JackRiddler Jan 2012 #36
Ah ProSense Jan 2012 #38
This is about right. (It's a ranking, not an endorsement.) cthulu2016 Jan 2012 #19
Yes. If they were completely idealistic and not a bit pragmatic, no one would score... JackRiddler Jan 2012 #26
If this surprised you, then you do not know WHY the ACLU was founded nadinbrzezinski Jan 2012 #27
Didn't surprise me. I am an ACLU donor and former drug using LP voter. banned from Kos Jan 2012 #33
Scratches head and walks away... nadinbrzezinski Jan 2012 #41
Which is why one-issue organizations are about one issue frazzled Jan 2012 #34
Yes. With an incumbant and challengers you're always comparing performance with promises cthulu2016 Jan 2012 #37
But that is a really stupid metric frazzled Jan 2012 #39
What stances? worker33 Jan 2012 #43
Slashing government spending, reducing taxes, anti-Fed ... frazzled Jan 2012 #45
Has the ACLU noticed Ron Paul's draconian, christofascist stance on women?? kestrel91316 Jan 2012 #40
Yes, why the score card on those issues was so low nadinbrzezinski Jan 2012 #42
You do know that its usually the right wingers who hate the ACLU? quinnox Jan 2012 #44
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»ACLU candidate scorecard:...»Reply #24