Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

In reply to the discussion: News about Fukushima [View all]

longship

(40,416 posts)
35. CS 137 is a big problem
Sun Aug 5, 2012, 02:39 PM
Aug 2012

Iodine isn't. It has a very short half life and you can take iodine -- which the Japanese should be doing -- to limit the uptake of the radioactive version.

But the damned Cesium-137 has a half life of 30 years and metabolizes into bones. That's a huge problem.

I don't know what they're going to do about it, but I would be recommending that they seal those reactors up as fast as they can. I don't see any way to clean them up without killing the workers doing it. Hell! Just sealing them up would likely kill a bunch of workers. Just like at Chernobyl.

Somebody's going to have to make that decision. I am glad it isn't me.

This isn't going to go away. They're going to have to do something eventually. They can't just ignore it.

BTW, the exclusion zone is very likely too small. Just saying.

Poor Japan. They're in a lose-lose scenerio.

I do not know about the radioactivity in tuna and such. Small exposures are not generally harmful. Physicists work in those environments for decades and still live long lives. But radioactive food is worrisome because it's absorbed into your body. I hope somebody is monitoring this, just in case.

Frankly, I don't think there are any easy solutions. It won't be doomsday as some here have suggested. But it's a pretty big problem which isn't going away. Japan undoubtedly knows this. Indecision is understandable and probably does not have a huge downside, in spite of what some say.

But if they take the wrong action, it could have a monumental down side. I would rather they wait and get it right than screw it up and make an even bigger mess. They already have screwed things up bad enough. Best to be cautious at this point. I think.

I may be wrong. But I watch NHK news every afternoon and they haven't said much about a solution even though they talk about Fukushima regularly.

It is scary, though.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

News about Fukushima [View all] RobertEarl Aug 2012 OP
What a mess. UnrepentantLiberal Aug 2012 #1
No nukes. Obama this means you. grahamhgreen Aug 2012 #2
knr. This one scares the hell out of me. chknltl Aug 2012 #3
That's got to be a heavy particle bombardment to mess up electronics. Spitfire of ATJ Aug 2012 #4
More likely, while the robots are exposed to the intense radiation they become very radioactive chemenger Aug 2012 #49
AFAIK It cannot blow to pieces. longship Aug 2012 #5
Nukes are alive and not well. Fuddnik Aug 2012 #6
That is an entirely different argument. longship Aug 2012 #7
By "Modular Nuke" you're talking radiothermal generators (RTG) localroger Aug 2012 #37
I stand corrected. Thank you! longship Aug 2012 #42
Not natural? Edweird Aug 2012 #8
I was addressing Plutonium longship Aug 2012 #10
I agree that we should not make it in the first place. Edweird Aug 2012 #11
It's easier to launch out of the solar system longship Aug 2012 #13
So we are going to launch it into space - without knowing what the consequences can be? Isn't jwirr Aug 2012 #15
Well, it isn't going to really happen, is it? longship Aug 2012 #19
Agreed - this is really a problem. One that has been setting around for a long time. And it involves jwirr Aug 2012 #23
what did Jupiter ever do to us? magical thyme Aug 2012 #22
Well, it is a big gravity sink. longship Aug 2012 #24
Actually, a subduction zone would be perfect localroger Aug 2012 #38
Ahhh! I remember that now. longship Aug 2012 #39
It can blow up, has "blown up". But not in the way you're thinking. Not like a nuclear bomb. Poll_Blind Aug 2012 #21
Not Doomsday but Doomscentury due to all those fission products in the food chain flamingdem Aug 2012 #29
CS 137 is a big problem longship Aug 2012 #35
The way in which this receives no serious coverage on M$Greedia malaise Aug 2012 #9
The way the rest of the world seems to be ignoring this dixiegrrrrl Aug 2012 #12
You're right malaise Aug 2012 #16
The media is mostly invested in or outright owned by the nuclear industry. raouldukelives Aug 2012 #33
KNR. This has become an invisible story. Thanks GEMSNBC for staying ontop of it. leveymg Aug 2012 #14
Godzilla, Rodan, AND Mothra longship Aug 2012 #25
Maybe Japan could just incentivize its relationship with radiation? leveymg Aug 2012 #32
Just to be clear, there is no way in this god's green earth nadinbrzezinski Aug 2012 #17
Actually there was a mushroom cloud RobertEarl Aug 2012 #45
Yes small explosions can produce a mushrom cloud, but nadinbrzezinski Aug 2012 #47
You are like the M$M RobertEarl Aug 2012 #50
Yes, but not a nuclear weapon, which is what you are implying. nadinbrzezinski Aug 2012 #51
Do those clouds travel around the earth? kentuck Aug 2012 #18
Per ast year nadinbrzezinski Aug 2012 #27
You can by some time by moving to the southern hemisphere. CrispyQ Aug 2012 #34
Yay nukes! Nukes good! Nukes on or near fault lines better! More nukes please!! nc4bo Aug 2012 #20
This message was self-deleted by its author darkangel218 Aug 2012 #26
There are portable units nadinbrzezinski Aug 2012 #28
Where do i go to borrow one? darkangel218 Aug 2012 #30
Nevermind, i googled it, its too expensive. darkangel218 Aug 2012 #31
Just get a dosimeter. longship Aug 2012 #36
dosimeters measure dose indie9197 Aug 2012 #41
Call someone at a nearby Health Physics Society Chapter indie9197 Aug 2012 #40
My car was manufactured in Hiroshima darkangel218 Aug 2012 #43
From what I read cars CAN DEFINITELY be contaminated. PearliePoo2 Aug 2012 #52
Early on, critics were chervilant Aug 2012 #44
NRC in the US RobertEarl Aug 2012 #46
The M$M chervilant Aug 2012 #48
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»News about Fukushima»Reply #35