General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: NYT: 'On Gay Rights, Obama Lets Surrogates Lead' [View all]MADem
(135,425 posts)I have to say, though, it would seem to me that at least some agencies of the Federal government--most particularly, Hillary Clinton's State Department--are already ignoring DOMA like, dare I say, a Big Dog!
HRC is paying for travel and per diem (and the associated family programs/job preference opportunities) for spouses of gay state department personnel, which is something that DOMA specifically prohibits. It would seem that this administration, particularly the lead cabinet position's agency, doesn't give a shit about DOMA.
Maybe Obama did one of those "I'm ignoring this law" things, or maybe they just decided to flout it and dare anyone to come after them. I don't know what the mechanics are, but I do know that the administration has an "attitude" towards DOMA and it ain't "Aww, that's dandy."
It'll be interesting to read the history of the repeal of the law--I hope we'll be doing that soon.