Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

FBaggins

(26,900 posts)
11. That doesn't make sense... and in fact is contradictory
Fri Jun 29, 2018, 11:11 PM
Jun 2018

Virtually all consequential supreme court cases involve an argument from the administration. If he had to recuse himself from such cases... he would have had to retire right after the inauguration... yet the point of these threads is how we didn't want him to retire?

However - the argument is false. He might have to recuse himself from cases involving his son's business (SCOTUS judges decide for themselves when they should recuse themselves)... but that would be the case anyway. If there's no current business relationship then there's no conflict.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Can somebody please expla...»Reply #11