Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Warren DeMontague

(80,708 posts)
21. No, because the "values voters" are a fringe minority.
Tue Jan 3, 2012, 03:48 AM
Jan 2012

The economic policies of the GOP are way more popular than the wingnut wack-a-doo Dominionist Godbagger shit. Your average meat-n-potatoes American doesn't want to outlaw birth control, doesn't hate gay people, but offer him or her a tax cut that sounds like free money, and they're all over it.

Where the conventional wisdom poo-bahs have gotten it wrong for years, they've overestimated the strength of the authoritarian godbaggers and poo-pooh'ed the socially libertarian majority that wants to do things like end the drug war.

Our party would do better if we would combine a spirited defense and advocacy for sane solid economic safety net and infrastructure issues- a liveable min. wage, a SPHC system, massive domestic investment in repairing and upgrading everything about our nation- combining that with a REAL socially (small l) libertarian agenda of ending the drug war, legalizing and taxing marijuana, demanding full marriage equality for LGBT citizens, unapologetically supporting full reproductive freedom, and shoring up the bill of rights in the areas it has been weakened in the past decades....

But regardless, Santorum would get his ass kicked in the GE. The majority of Americans are pro-choice, and no matter how fucking Howdy Doody friendly he makes himself sound, his Godbagger shit wouldn't go over well at all.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Froth has no substance DJ13 Jan 2012 #1
No. Santorum has a limited appeal, little funding, and no top-rate campaign experience. beyurslf Jan 2012 #2
no. santorum is a raving lunatic. bowens43 Jan 2012 #3
mitt is the only real competition. santorum is a side show.. think Jan 2012 #4
We should much prefer Santorum for Romney for the nomination Gman Jan 2012 #5
NO Angry Dragon Jan 2012 #6
NO. nm rhett o rick Jan 2012 #7
The Only Better Choice BeaufortPenguin Jan 2012 #8
I think they are equally easy to beat but for different reasons. stevenleser Jan 2012 #9
As the Romney nomination reaches certainty, watch for ads calling out Obama SaintPete Jan 2012 #15
In most GE's, the battle is for the Middle. johnaries Jan 2012 #10
Lol! NO. So, goooooooo rick! deacon Jan 2012 #11
No...and it won't happen lacrew Jan 2012 #12
Romney is the chosen one Skittles Jan 2012 #13
no. Tuesday Afternoon Jan 2012 #14
Why yes! Proud Liberal Dem Jan 2012 #16
Absolutely not RobertEmmet Jan 2012 #17
Oh my, no JohnnyRingo Jan 2012 #18
That's not the consensus among the punditry, but we know how right they tend to be maximusveritas Jan 2012 #19
Hmmm...... dhill926 Jan 2012 #20
No, because the "values voters" are a fringe minority. Warren DeMontague Jan 2012 #21
They are a fringe minority, but are the energy and campaign workers for the campaigns. stevenleser Jan 2012 #22
whose positions did I misstate, pray tell? Warren DeMontague Jan 2012 #24
No, you didn't. That is a new sig line I am experimenting with. I probably won't keep it. stevenleser Jan 2012 #27
No Inuca Jan 2012 #23
that's a good way to put it: Santorum equals Huckabee minus Gomer Pyle. yurbud Jan 2012 #25
There is no doubt in my mind Santorum would be more difficult to beat NNN0LHI Jan 2012 #26
Nope....Mittens worries me because he has that plastic used-car salesman smile so many on the right truebrit71 Jan 2012 #28
I disagree Inuca Jan 2012 #29
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»would Santorum be Tougher...»Reply #21