Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

joshcryer

(62,536 posts)
14. I agree with you, if you have cause to go after someone, they should get a jury trial.
Tue Jan 3, 2012, 05:21 AM
Jan 2012

It doesn't matter if they're a US citizen. It's just not "politically expedient," to go that route, and our politicians are cowards. Yes, I think drone strikes are immoral cowardly behavior. I would even be against "boots on the ground" unless the first and foremost behavior was to capture, not kill or capture, capture, defend, and if totally necessary, kill. We're talking about besieging various militant groups for as long as it takes until they surrender.

I think also, part of the problem is that the evidence against these militants is iffy at best, they might be able to be charged by the parent state with some arms issues, but other than that, we probably don't have a case in most situations, so we wouldn't even go that route if we wanted to.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Unaccountable Killing Mac...»Reply #14