Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Is anyone else really tired of "Alleged?" [View all]kenfrequed
(7,865 posts)6. This was better worded than my response.
Personally, I am really tired of street crime taking such a prominent place in the news. But yes, I think it is important that our media actually treat 'Innocent until proven guilty' in a More absolute fashion. If anything they need to back off further from reporting on crime and punishment.
Of course in this particular case, the crime is particularly odious and the motive is probably apparent and the evidence is rather strong, but we still have to provide these rights, even to monsters.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
84 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
"Why should the media wait for a jury?" I can't believe you think that's a serious question
muriel_volestrangler
Aug 2012
#68
So the whole thread is sarcasm? You are actually happy that they say 'alleged'?
muriel_volestrangler
Aug 2012
#71
It seems to be a matter of "dballance knows the point where the media can drop 'alleged'
muriel_volestrangler
Aug 2012
#78
This is the reason for using the word alleged, because of lawsuits. They still play it as guilty,
freshwest
Aug 2012
#83
The person accused is innocent until proven guilty even if he or she
coalition_unwilling
Aug 2012
#23
"Legally" they are considered innocent. In real life, that tag doesn't mean the same thing. I do agr
uppityperson
Aug 2012
#25
"would you have called him convicted before conviction"? What? No, then he was alleged, legally.
uppityperson
Aug 2012
#27
I'm Happy to go with "alleged" when it applies. Jon-Benet Ramsey Case in point
dballance
Aug 2012
#21
Exactly. It doesn't matter how guilty they may be. You're one hung jury away from a civil suit.
Xithras
Aug 2012
#33
No. "Innocent until proven guilty" is what keeps us from becoming a police state.
Chorophyll
Aug 2012
#32
You are wrong about everything, including the name of someone you are calling a murderer.
Bluenorthwest
Aug 2012
#42
there probably isn't any doubt in these cases - but I would NEVER want to abandon the principle
Douglas Carpenter
Aug 2012
#46
Not the least bit tired. It's a very important journalistic standard. (nt)
Posteritatis
Aug 2012
#51
It seems ridiculous in some situations, but I prefer it until a conviction is final.
Tommy_Carcetti
Aug 2012
#82