Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Is anyone else really tired of "Alleged?" [View all]Enrique
(27,461 posts)16. it might vary among the various newspapers
maybe they have a clear cut rule, maybe it's a judgement call. Maybe the reporter asks his boss, "should I keep saying alleged now that he's dead?" Maybe we think they made the wrong call in some case, who knows? But to throw out the whole practice, I don't see a reason for that.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
84 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
"Why should the media wait for a jury?" I can't believe you think that's a serious question
muriel_volestrangler
Aug 2012
#68
So the whole thread is sarcasm? You are actually happy that they say 'alleged'?
muriel_volestrangler
Aug 2012
#71
It seems to be a matter of "dballance knows the point where the media can drop 'alleged'
muriel_volestrangler
Aug 2012
#78
This is the reason for using the word alleged, because of lawsuits. They still play it as guilty,
freshwest
Aug 2012
#83
The person accused is innocent until proven guilty even if he or she
coalition_unwilling
Aug 2012
#23
"Legally" they are considered innocent. In real life, that tag doesn't mean the same thing. I do agr
uppityperson
Aug 2012
#25
"would you have called him convicted before conviction"? What? No, then he was alleged, legally.
uppityperson
Aug 2012
#27
I'm Happy to go with "alleged" when it applies. Jon-Benet Ramsey Case in point
dballance
Aug 2012
#21
Exactly. It doesn't matter how guilty they may be. You're one hung jury away from a civil suit.
Xithras
Aug 2012
#33
No. "Innocent until proven guilty" is what keeps us from becoming a police state.
Chorophyll
Aug 2012
#32
You are wrong about everything, including the name of someone you are calling a murderer.
Bluenorthwest
Aug 2012
#42
there probably isn't any doubt in these cases - but I would NEVER want to abandon the principle
Douglas Carpenter
Aug 2012
#46
Not the least bit tired. It's a very important journalistic standard. (nt)
Posteritatis
Aug 2012
#51
It seems ridiculous in some situations, but I prefer it until a conviction is final.
Tommy_Carcetti
Aug 2012
#82