Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Enrique

(27,461 posts)
16. it might vary among the various newspapers
Tue Aug 7, 2012, 09:54 AM
Aug 2012

maybe they have a clear cut rule, maybe it's a judgement call. Maybe the reporter asks his boss, "should I keep saying alleged now that he's dead?" Maybe we think they made the wrong call in some case, who knows? But to throw out the whole practice, I don't see a reason for that.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Is anyone else really tired of a fair trial? Renew Deal Aug 2012 #1
This was better worded than my response. kenfrequed Aug 2012 #6
MSM reports on what best fattens their bottom line, so they will milk this RKP5637 Aug 2012 #29
Of a dead man? cthulu2016 Aug 2012 #7
Interesting take on my thread - I never advocated against fair trials dballance Aug 2012 #14
But a responsible media SHOULD wait for a jury. joeglow3 Aug 2012 #39
Why should the media wait for a jury? dballance Aug 2012 #60
"Why should the media wait for a jury?" I can't believe you think that's a serious question muriel_volestrangler Aug 2012 #68
You obviously managed to miss my disdain for our current media dballance Aug 2012 #70
So the whole thread is sarcasm? You are actually happy that they say 'alleged'? muriel_volestrangler Aug 2012 #71
Wow, such twisted logic dballance Aug 2012 #76
It seems to be a matter of "dballance knows the point where the media can drop 'alleged' muriel_volestrangler Aug 2012 #78
get over yourself muriel dballance Aug 2012 #79
You think "go to freeper-land" is part of an argument? muriel_volestrangler Aug 2012 #80
Post removed Post removed Aug 2012 #81
I remember they called Richard Jewel a "suspect" & got sued. DirkGently Aug 2012 #74
This is the reason for using the word alleged, because of lawsuits. They still play it as guilty, freshwest Aug 2012 #83
Then you're agreed that mugshots should not be published IDemo Aug 2012 #24
Definitely pscot Aug 2012 #2
Not really. CJCRANE Aug 2012 #3
when the person doing the shooting is shot dead, they aren't "alleged" Bluerthanblue Aug 2012 #4
The media sometimes gets it wrong. CJCRANE Aug 2012 #12
I'm not basing this on the media- the police Bluerthanblue Aug 2012 #22
The police frequently get it wrong too. DirkGently Aug 2012 #77
I never said anyone should be deprived of due process dballance Aug 2012 #15
The thing is... CJCRANE Aug 2012 #17
Right, there was a gun-toting Sikh - are you serious? dballance Aug 2012 #44
Thankyou for the interesting discussion. CJCRANE Aug 2012 #48
Thank You. I was wrong. dballance Aug 2012 #50
it's just a convention Enrique Aug 2012 #5
The man is dead. When would you remove the alleged tag? cthulu2016 Aug 2012 #9
it might vary among the various newspapers Enrique Aug 2012 #16
We agree. I certainly disagree with the OPs as regards living suspects. cthulu2016 Aug 2012 #20
*Allegedly* dead. Robb Aug 2012 #55
I know it's a serious topic, but this made me lol. closeupready Aug 2012 #63
It's not a convention; it's a legal imperative frazzled Aug 2012 #10
The person accused is innocent until proven guilty even if he or she coalition_unwilling Aug 2012 #23
"Legally" they are considered innocent. In real life, that tag doesn't mean the same thing. I do agr uppityperson Aug 2012 #25
I don't think there is going to be a trial jberryhill Aug 2012 #57
No. Sirhan Sirhan had a gun in his hands Marzupialis Aug 2012 #8
funny, but Sirhan Sirhan isn't the "alleged" killer- he is the convicted Bluerthanblue Aug 2012 #11
But would you have called him "convicted" before conviction? Marzupialis Aug 2012 #13
"would you have called him convicted before conviction"? What? No, then he was alleged, legally. uppityperson Aug 2012 #27
Thanks saying "legally" for the first time Marzupialis Aug 2012 #43
aren't we discussing the "legal" terms in this OP Bluerthanblue Aug 2012 #61
Ok we agree then Marzupialis Aug 2012 #64
no problem- Bluerthanblue Aug 2012 #67
Apparently, the jury is still out on this allegedly silly OP n/t Nuclear Unicorn Aug 2012 #18
NO, I DO NOT! Courtesy Flush Aug 2012 #19
Actually, I think there are many corrupt police AND DA's dballance Aug 2012 #28
Which further bolsters my opinion Courtesy Flush Aug 2012 #41
You are absolutely right dballance Aug 2012 #72
I'm Happy to go with "alleged" when it applies. Jon-Benet Ramsey Case in point dballance Aug 2012 #21
Libel laws. X_Digger Aug 2012 #26
Exactly. It doesn't matter how guilty they may be. You're one hung jury away from a civil suit. Xithras Aug 2012 #33
This message was self-deleted by its author CJCRANE Aug 2012 #35
I am tired of it in certain cases but understand why they do it, usually. uppityperson Aug 2012 #30
This message was self-deleted by its author CJCRANE Aug 2012 #31
No. "Innocent until proven guilty" is what keeps us from becoming a police state. Chorophyll Aug 2012 #32
I never remember the media calling someone a murderer nichomachus Aug 2012 #34
Unintentionally ironic OP is unintentionally ironic. Brickbat Aug 2012 #36
Does anyone remember the Sam Sheppard case? BigAnth Aug 2012 #37
I think it is prudent for the media to use the term alleged. NCTraveler Aug 2012 #38
What days were those? Fawke Em Aug 2012 #40
You are wrong about everything, including the name of someone you are calling a murderer. Bluenorthwest Aug 2012 #42
Take it with the ap nadinbrzezinski Aug 2012 #45
there probably isn't any doubt in these cases - but I would NEVER want to abandon the principle Douglas Carpenter Aug 2012 #46
I'm not.. MicaelS Aug 2012 #47
It's the appropriate term until after the trial 4th law of robotics Aug 2012 #49
When do you think the trial is going to be? jberryhill Aug 2012 #58
For who? 4th law of robotics Aug 2012 #59
Sorry, wasn't specific jberryhill Aug 2012 #62
Not the least bit tired. It's a very important journalistic standard. (nt) Posteritatis Aug 2012 #51
But....but.... but!!! It coulda been his EVIL TWIN...! nt MADem Aug 2012 #52
You aren't the only person who's sick and tired of the Bill of Rights. DefenseLawyer Aug 2012 #53
I agree on the racist part JustAnotherGen Aug 2012 #54
I don't remember such "good old days" jberryhill Aug 2012 #56
First of all, I think your memory is faulty, MadHound Aug 2012 #65
In the case of a dead shooter or a suspected shooter... Kalidurga Aug 2012 #66
Generally speaking, it's the right thing to do RZM Aug 2012 #69
I prefer Red Mountain Aug 2012 #73
so you get to guess what is real news and fuck the legalities? oooookaaaay spanone Aug 2012 #75
It seems ridiculous in some situations, but I prefer it until a conviction is final. Tommy_Carcetti Aug 2012 #82
I am not tired of Alleged, because I am still an American. slampoet Aug 2012 #84
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Is anyone else really tir...»Reply #16