How will YOU survive global warming?

[patrice]

77. I do think in smaller terms & also with clearly laid out options up front, so that if, after a

series of choices that did not work out functionally for everyone, it becomes necessary for someone(s) to find other more appropriate arrangements, because of informed choices s/he made, that option is there for them. Just brainstorming here. My basic assumption is that no matter how many crazies there are, rational people can discover solutions for themselves, if they're willing to make decisions and accept the consequences of those decisions. So, the cook in your community turns out to be a Social Dominator and, after a series of informed behavioral choices and consequences, functional adaptations have not occurred, there is an option for people to move to other more appropriate/fitting situations, or not, and as a member I should place the atmosphere of the whole over how much I like what the cook does. Ultimately all of the Social Dominators will end up with no choice but one another, whether they comprise amongst themselves the skill sets that result a life or not.

Not sure how that would work out, but I'd prefer it to suffering and not doing anything about the causes of suffering. It would take dilegence and commitment, but evergreen functional adaptability might help people steer away from "The Beach" situations. One important driver and a difference between this idea and perhaps some others is personal, real value/work, equity that is completely portable and perhaps at least to some limited degree also fungible and I'm not talking about money here.