General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Can we put it to rest that Hillary was a "bad candidate" [View all]unblock
(56,324 posts)they would have just found another reason to have 9 investigations.
no one can dot every 'i' and cross every 't'. there's always something they could find where she didn't follow the exact protocol. especially easy when you use today's protocol to evaluate yesterday's actions.
look at benghazi, another fake scandal. they've been running fake scandals against hillary for a quarter-century.
she could have not had anyone in the white house travel office fired, then there would have been no travelgate. except they would have then just made a scandal out of the next person she had fired or hired or promoted.
you can critique how to manage the fake scandals, but not how to avoid them entirely. realistically, that's was never an option for hillary, and isn't an option for most democrats in general.