General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Salon: Democratic moderates fear the socialist left will wreck the party... [View all]tomp
(9,512 posts)...that could be roughly described as a right and a left wing (and of course some middle ground as well)?
I can see how the right wing of the party would object to being called such, but it's reality. I can see how they would prefer to be called "moderate." But words are funny things because that would leave people to the left of moderate as "immoderate" or "radical" which clearly can have a pejorative implication.
So, to be clear, there is a, objectively, a (right) wing of the party, which has no real problem with the capitalist/imperialist/corporate status quo, or at least don't want to go anywhere else in a hurry, and a (left) wing of the party, which insists sees a complicity of the former with the status quo (which is undeniably fucked up and has been in my lifetime) and is hungry, and frankly impatient for change.
If you don't see this I'd have to say you are naive and uninformed. If you see it but won't say it you're complicit.
So far, in this post and my others on this thread, I don't see the insults you mentioned. Just demonstrable facts. As Truman said, "I don't give 'em hell, I just give 'em the truth, and they think it's hell."