Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Kentonio

(4,377 posts)
17. Hmmm not really
Tue Jul 31, 2018, 11:22 AM
Jul 2018

The only link you have between the gun and the person who made it, is if you already have the person's identity and can check their internet/sales records. The only other option you'd have is to try and trace everyone who downloaded that particular gun print from the internet, which could be hundreds of thousands of people and then try and check if any of those people had also purchased a 3d printer (which you'd expect most of them would have, because otherwise why would they be downloading 3d print schematics?). Then what? Do you forensically examine every one of those 3d printers to see if it matches the print quality of the gun that was used to commit a crime?

Oh and of course if the person who downloaded it did so from a random computer and just saved the print schematic to a thumb drive, then you don't even have that chain to follow.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Why does it matter? Crutchez_CuiBono Jul 2018 #1
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ still_one Jul 2018 #2
3-D guns present a vector for implementing gun control hexola Jul 2018 #3
I think there might be some misdirected concern here. genxlib Jul 2018 #4
There's a difference between detection and tracing. hexola Jul 2018 #5
That might be true genxlib Jul 2018 #12
Starting from a 3D printed gun located at the scene of a crime markses66 Jul 2018 #6
Not sure - but hexola Jul 2018 #7
Seriously? EffieBlack Jul 2018 #9
Are you quite confident its not possible? hexola Jul 2018 #10
The Byzantine "tracing" process you propose is preposterous EffieBlack Jul 2018 #14
I designed and built my own 3d-printer... belcffub Jul 2018 #15
For starters genxlib Jul 2018 #16
Should be easy. Iggo Jul 2018 #24
Are saying purchases are never entered into evidence of a crime? hexola Jul 2018 #25
I want to know that it's a plausible task given your OP markses66 Jul 2018 #21
Not so easy. aikoaiko Jul 2018 #22
Maybe if the criminal leaves the gun behind. Seriously, how often does that happen? brush Jul 2018 #29
Hummuna Hummuna ... EffieBlack Jul 2018 #8
5 year old article - If You Can't Stop it, Trace it -- Personalised Forensics and 3D Printing hexola Jul 2018 #11
There are a lot of coulds and possibilities in that article... belcffub Jul 2018 #19
Did we start? Iggo Jul 2018 #13
Hmmm not really Kentonio Jul 2018 #17
Well, with enough tech know how Downtown Hound Jul 2018 #18
Not correct. Oneironaut Jul 2018 #20
If you want an untraceable gun, build a sub-machine gun in a rudimentary workshop Kaleva Jul 2018 #23
You can put a file on a disc to print it Johnny2X2X Jul 2018 #26
It shouldn't be much different than anti-counterfeit technology in printers hexola Jul 2018 #27
Actually I would guess more than 50% DVRacer Jul 2018 #28
Way less traceable than a manufactured gun with a serial number. n/t Orsino Jul 2018 #30
I'll accept less traceable - fair enough. hexola Jul 2018 #31
How would you trace a particular weapon? Orsino Jul 2018 #32
Today? I have no idea... hexola Jul 2018 #34
They will be difficult to trace to a crime because the weapon will most likely be Vinca Jul 2018 #33
Sounds like more of a lead than a metal gun at the bottom of a lake 5 states away hexola Jul 2018 #35
Not really. Disposable guns is a dream come true for criminals. Vinca Jul 2018 #37
Eh no. Chris Studio Jul 2018 #36
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Can we stop saying 3D gun...»Reply #17