Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

FBaggins

(28,706 posts)

31. You're missing that you're the one missing supporting text

Reply to lagomorph777 (Reply #25)

Tue Jul 31, 2018, 05:04 PM

Jul 2018

The Constitution is clear on how a president can be removed from office. You provided the text. It's what the Supreme Court called the "Constitutional Remedy" proving that Presidents are not above the law.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

37 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Mueller Has Evidence Trump Obstructed Justice [View all] babylonsister Jul 2018 OP

tbh mercuryblues Jul 2018 #1

this probably explains Trump's Tantrum yesterday. berni_mccoy Jul 2018 #2

To hell with congression recommendations (of impeachment). Indict the POS. triron Jul 2018 #3

but if 'a sitting president cant be indicted' he needs unseated first? TalenaGor Jul 2018 #8

That myth is explicitly disproven by the Constitution. lagomorph777 Jul 2018 #11

OH awesome thank you TalenaGor Jul 2018 #15

Print it out and keep it in your pocket. lagomorph777 Jul 2018 #18

this why I need smart people around me lol TalenaGor Jul 2018 #21

My librarian Mom taught me that to look smart, you just have to know lagomorph777 Jul 2018 #22

I remember my son saying something similar. murielm99 Jul 2018 #27

That's incorrect FBaggins Jul 2018 #24

Show me the text. It's not in there that I can find. lagomorph777 Jul 2018 #25

The text is the in what you quoted DetroitLegalBeagle Jul 2018 #28

It can be argued "no" but that's not what the text says - I go by what it says. lagomorph777 Aug 2018 #37

You're missing that you're the one missing supporting text FBaggins Jul 2018 #31

I'm certainly no Constitutional scholar, but wasn't this settled re: Bill Clinton Algernon Moncrieff Jul 2018 #30

Long before that really. FBaggins Jul 2018 #32

Nice. Saving this. Squinch Jul 2018 #29

If its a confidential memo how will we ever know what's in it? procon Jul 2018 #4

"a confidential White House memorandum, which is in the special counsel's possession" honest.abe Jul 2018 #5

Please let it be over... time to start impeachment proceedings! InAbLuEsTaTe Jul 2018 #6

naaa rtracey Jul 2018 #20

It will be in Rosenstein's call JonLP24 Jul 2018 #7

Rosenstein - hold onto it until next year lame54 Jul 2018 #9

Me too; it's on my DVR. lagomorph777 Jul 2018 #10

"Obstruction isn't really a crime" from Giuliani in 3...2...1... (nt) ehrnst Jul 2018 #12

Obviously a lot of focus on trump, but... MGKrebs Jul 2018 #13

If he pardons them... Louis1895 Jul 2018 #17

Original story in New York Review of Books jayschool2013 Jul 2018 #14

Maybe, but I don't expect an indictment. LudwigPastorius Jul 2018 #16

DOJ policy can/should be changed; it's just policy, not law or the Constitution. lagomorph777 Jul 2018 #19

"Fate of the world" is a bit of an overstatement metalbot Jul 2018 #33

can/should... LudwigPastorius Jul 2018 #34

Indictment barely describes the layers of charges that will be laid bucolic_frolic Jul 2018 #23

The powers that be do have a way around this quagmire metalbot Jul 2018 #35

he obstructs justice on a daily basis. spanone Jul 2018 #26

K&R Scurrilous Jul 2018 #36