Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Are Nordic countries really socialist? [View all]NurseJackie
(42,862 posts)3. I think many like to use that word for ...
Would we have more success electing officials and passing laws that expand the safety net if we didn't use the word "socialist?"
I think many like to use that word for vanity-purposes and other self-serving purposes. I also believe that there are many who prefer it for the "shock value" (so to speak) of it. There's a certain inflammatory aspect to it that says "hey everyone, look at me" with a subtle "I think I'm purer than you"message.
What I'm trying to say is that I agree with what the article says and the facts presented and how it helps to illustrate that the "socialist" label (as you note) widely misunderstood and misused. That's the danger of unfettered pride mixed with an incomplete understanding. The human mind just "fills in" the missing pieces of the picture (whether accurate or not) that help to create or complete the image of how they believe they should appear in a mirror, even if that's not the same image that everyone else actually sees.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
85 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Now let's turn our attention to conservatives who call Obama and school shooting survivors socialist
ck4829
Aug 2018
#2
Not only aren't they "socialist", but they're tiny countries (population-wise).....
George II
Aug 2018
#4
And I see the opposite! Capitalism in its pure form is focused only on profits.
yardwork
Aug 2018
#10
Capitalism has very little to do with the divisions you're talking about. Those are intrinsic....
George II
Aug 2018
#14
"'Socialism' is a term that has come to mean whatever people want it to mean."
brer cat
Aug 2018
#17
Yes, you're right. He's been an avowed socialist for years. I still don't think it was smart...
brush
Aug 2018
#69
There are a few linguists who think English isn't a west Germanic language,
The Velveteen Ocelot
Aug 2018
#28
Good points. Their naivete in describing themselves as socialists, though well meaning...
brush
Aug 2018
#44
I think it's interesting that these countries are some of the most "happy" people
mitch96
Aug 2018
#36
The author's point of view is pretty transparent, but where are his facts wrong?
yardwork
Aug 2018
#73
Seems like all over the place...like lefties love for Castro and Madura...and when it
JCanete
Aug 2018
#75
I don't just disagree. He literally contradicts himself by defining socialism the way he has in the
JCanete
Aug 2018
#77
How about contributing to a railing against the term. Also, you've indicated agreement with this
JCanete
Aug 2018
#79
They are mixed economies, just like ours. Are we really Capitalist? That label seems to be
JCanete
Aug 2018
#74