Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Oneironaut

(6,306 posts)
36. That's the problem with all racketeering-like cases, if you think about it.
Tue Aug 7, 2018, 06:19 PM
Aug 2018

The star witnesses are usually criminals who “flipped.”

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Not your ideal star witness. n/t PoliticAverse Aug 2018 #1
His Personal Activities Are Irrelevant LandOfHopeAndDreams Aug 2018 #2
I don't think I'd call stealing money from the defendant "irrelevant". A witness's criminal PoliticAverse Aug 2018 #6
Why believe any criminal informant? SunSeeker Aug 2018 #8
"Why believe any criminal informant?" - That's a good question. I wonder what the 12 jury members wi PoliticAverse Aug 2018 #10
Are you actually suggesting juries disregard criminal informants' testimony? SunSeeker Aug 2018 #11
Do you know what the word "ideal" means? To point out something has flaws is not to dismiss its PoliticAverse Aug 2018 #13
Well duh. Then what was the point of your post? Do YOU think he should not be believed? nt SunSeeker Aug 2018 #16
I think the corroborating testimony of less flawed witnesses and actual physical evidence... PoliticAverse Aug 2018 #22
So you won't answer the question? SunSeeker Aug 2018 #24
I didn't suggest he wouldn't be ultimately believed by the jury. And as to my opinion on his... PoliticAverse Aug 2018 #25
Ah, but you apparently heard enough to lament that he is not the "ideal witness." SunSeeker Aug 2018 #26
Which, as we all can agree, he isn't. n/t PoliticAverse Aug 2018 #28
He's the ideal witness against Manafort, being his right hand man. SunSeeker Aug 2018 #30
Why believe him now? Because of a mountain of paperwork confirming his testimony, pnwmom Aug 2018 #9
Right! With the paper he is corroborated. Without it I doubt it. Jersey Devil Aug 2018 #31
Mueller wanted to interview all the choir boys in Manafort's circle of friends tavernier Aug 2018 #12
Diogenes would have given up quickly, I think. n/t PoliticAverse Aug 2018 #14
Manafort stole the money he had, from banks, countries. No honor among thieves. notdarkyet Aug 2018 #29
No informant is. No one who flips on a perp has a clean background. SunSeeker Aug 2018 #7
I know! gratuitous Aug 2018 #18
LOL SunSeeker Aug 2018 #27
Probably difficult to get a clean Republican star witness. LiberalFighter Aug 2018 #35
That's the problem with all racketeering-like cases, if you think about it. Oneironaut Aug 2018 #36
Was that from a question from Manafort's lawyer? nt awesomerwb1 Aug 2018 #3
Yes. And CNN reports it a bit differently, janx Aug 2018 #21
"Set a crook, to catch a crook". SharonAnn Aug 2018 #4
... when you're all out of fucks to give, and you just don't want to die in prison. NightWatcher Aug 2018 #5
Post removed Post removed Aug 2018 #15
Wow. You sure are mad at Gates for doing the right thing and spilling on Manafort. SunSeeker Aug 2018 #17
I heard people saying that on Fox News at the tire store TeamPooka Aug 2018 #20
We won't know how willing Manafort is to "keep his mouth shut" until some time in the future... PoliticAverse Aug 2018 #23
darned him! H2O Man Aug 2018 #32
Just another Republican. TeamPooka Aug 2018 #19
Gates is not evidence. He corroborates the evidence. Sneederbunk Aug 2018 #33
Sammy the Bull Gravano turned on John Gotti marylandblue Aug 2018 #34
You mean the guy helping Manafort launder and steal money, was dishonest? Johonny Aug 2018 #37
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Rick Gates admits extra-m...»Reply #36