MI-GOV: Abdul continues his daily scorched earth attacks against Whitmer.

[Ninsianna]

236. Crain's engaged in speculation, they could not back up anything they implied.

1) no proof of an alliance
2) no proof of any organizational arrangmements
3) no proof of any corporate money
4) no answer from the enttite

So no proof, just speculation, that's not what we who know what accuracy means, consider to be accurate.

Crains made general, negative unsupported statements, you admit and acknowledge that they have no proof, they indulge El-Sayed's equally baseless speculation, and conclude that I'm somehow at fault for pointing out that the lack of proof of baseless speculation that isn't backed up by anything is inaccurate?

The weakness of baseless speculation based on poor research and zero facts, and the amplifying of baseless speculation by a guy who has a habit of lying is evident in and of itself. There was no balanced coverage here, this wasn't even handed, it was fully all about implication, speculation and not doing their basic homework.

Sorry that it's hard to figure out how "no proof' and baseless nonsense that is unconfirmed and not able to backed up reads to you as "balanced even handed coverage", it's literally the exact opposite of that.