Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Congressional Black Caucus chair blasts proposed superdelegate changes [View all]Gothmog
(179,330 posts)223. This was a well done and accurate explanation of super delegates
Thanks for posting
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
293 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Congressional Black Caucus chair blasts proposed superdelegate changes [View all]
Gothmog
Aug 2018
OP
The superdelegate concept represents the ultimate in conceit and heavyhandedness.
Sophia4
Aug 2018
#168
So in addition to not voting for our party's nominee, you have not worked on a campaign in
Gothmog
Aug 2018
#196
What we do not need are caucuses, the modern-day version of the old smoke-filled rooms,
pnwmom
Aug 2018
#293
He won. Do you really think that Republicans would not have won the electoral college
Sophia4
Aug 2018
#199
You're a broken record. You don't know any of that. You just keep repeating yourself.
brush
Aug 2018
#204
Wikipedia on the history of superdelegates. They are a more recent idea than you would think.
Sophia4
Aug 2018
#195
Super delegates are not elected. They vote as delegates without being elected by the
Sophia4
Aug 2018
#63
Their purpose is to serve as a failsafe and to put someone over 2382 when a race is close.
Garrett78
Aug 2018
#137
No, no strawman. They are people who vote at the convention on behalf of others.
boston bean
Aug 2018
#157
The Democratic Party should support and defend the idea of one vote, one person
Sophia4
Aug 2018
#53
I and all the other party members who do the leg-work, who make the calls, who talk
Sophia4
Aug 2018
#7
No less lazy than voters who get up early, travel rain or shine, stand in line to vote in primaries
Sophia4
Aug 2018
#10
Hillary won most votes without superdelegates alsoi and you did not vote for the nominee
JI7
Aug 2018
#22
Most articulate post I have seen in a long time. I hope you didin't confuse anyone with the facts.
still_one
Aug 2018
#229
If the superdelegates don't make a difference in the outcome of the election, then
Sophia4
Aug 2018
#59
The Democratic Party can end the custom of superdelegates as well as the caucuses
Sophia4
Aug 2018
#69
The candidate who won the most votes did not need the superdelegates to win the
Sophia4
Aug 2018
#178
You don't know that trump would not have been stopped so stop pretending you do.
brush
Aug 2018
#182
You are the one spreading misinformation leading to "misunderstandings and controversies" yet you
bettyellen
Aug 2018
#202
Weird spell correction. Why do YOU spread the misinformation and then use it as justification?
bettyellen
Aug 2018
#210
So you think that the CBC is wrong. Why do you think that you know more than they do
ehrnst
Aug 2018
#172
This almost sounds like you didn't vote for the Democratic candidate in the 2016 general election.
lapucelle
Aug 2018
#86
I, like all Americans, vote for the candidate that I believe is the best for my country.
Sophia4
Aug 2018
#170
You are accusing Dems of dishonesty and corruption. Wow. Something smells alright.
bettyellen
Aug 2018
#65
Did I read upthread that you did not vote for the Democratic nominee in the 2016 GE?
lapucelle
Aug 2018
#80
Neither of these two members of the CBC had any kind things to say about sanders
Gothmog
Aug 2018
#110
Thanks. I'm in California where we have primaries. Caucuses are unfair to working
Sophia4
Aug 2018
#15
Caucuses should be gone. But they have nothing to do with the popular vote.
LiberalFighter
Aug 2018
#28
Smoke filled rooms were OK when communication was poor, back in the 19th century.
Sophia4
Aug 2018
#66
And as they have never reversed the will of the primary voters, what good has it done?
mythology
Aug 2018
#133
The only way one group could be harmed is if superdelegates decide the nomination
mythology
Aug 2018
#17
Members of the CBC are more important to the party than people pushing this rule change
Gothmog
Aug 2018
#34
Again these are leaders of the party who are more important to the party than sanders supporters
Gothmog
Aug 2018
#39
All of the materials that I have seen is that it is sanders and his followers pushing this
Gothmog
Aug 2018
#236
Funny thing about privilege. People don't like it when others have it but like it when it
jalan48
Aug 2018
#41
I'm not sure how giving disproportionate power to people annointed with it is reasonable to him.
JCanete
Aug 2018
#43
What does that mean in this context? whatever a member of CBC says you are automatically on board?
JCanete
Aug 2018
#67
I'm not comforable with Bee's framing at all. She literally led up to it with talking about Carter
JCanete
Aug 2018
#74
needless to say, you didnt' address any of my points, convincing me that I should reconsider, with
JCanete
Aug 2018
#226
you refuted 0 points I made. I mean, tell yourself whatever you want to tell yourself,
JCanete
Aug 2018
#249
Okay, for whatever reasons you want to have this conversation without actually having a conversation
JCanete
Aug 2018
#252
when an OR candidate loses by a small margin it isn't making a difference, it is "failing"
JCanete
Aug 2018
#259
I, too, stand with the CBC, and not with those who seek to dilute the power of elected minorities...
Tarheel_Dem
Aug 2018
#70
Superdelegates, like caucuses, are undemocratic relics of the past. It is also extremely asinine
tritsofme
Aug 2018
#89
Elected officials also increase the influence of states that elect democrats to office
Gothmog
Aug 2018
#112
Right they should not exist. I support the Democratic party's decision in this.
Tiggeroshii
Aug 2018
#121
You were a bound delegate. Very different from what an unbound superdelegate was.
Tiggeroshii
Aug 2018
#122
You stand correct. However pledged delegates are far more democratic than superdelegates.
Tiggeroshii
Aug 2018
#142
The local party activists and officials, and Members of Congress can all have one vote like the rest
CentralMass
Aug 2018
#131