Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

lapfog_1

(29,199 posts)

1. It harms the United States

Reply to dameatball (Original post)

Wed Aug 15, 2018, 04:30 PM

Aug 2018

by removing a source of institutional memory... in this case institutional memory with a security clearance.

So when a meeting with Putin or Kim or someone comes up... the current DNI can't call up Brennan and ask about the meeting that happened a few years ago where X said Y.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

18 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

So, in what way does the revocation actually hurt Brennan? [View all] dameatball Aug 2018 OP

It harms the United States lapfog_1 Aug 2018 #1

That depends on what he wants to do work wise Phoenix61 Aug 2018 #2

Good point. dameatball Aug 2018 #3

I wonder if his employer filed the paperwork exboyfil Aug 2018 #10

It doesn't RandySF Aug 2018 #4

They would be only hurting themselves if they cared about the country. justhanginon Aug 2018 #14

It does show the Pig is using his office to punish or censor his political opponents... Thomas Hurt Aug 2018 #5

In what way does it harm democracy? Or freedom of speech? GusBob Aug 2018 #6

? handmade34 Aug 2018 #15

Two concepts to answer your questions PJMcK Aug 2018 #17

It deprives OUR government C_U_L8R Aug 2018 #7

It doesn't hurt Brennan as much as it hurts the United States because he can no longer consult The Velveteen Ocelot Aug 2018 #8

The orange one's action.... chillfactor Aug 2018 #9

If Brennan's expertise was needed and he was consulted by current national security employees Freethinker65 Aug 2018 #11

It reduces his marketability. People pay big for people... PoliticAverse Aug 2018 #12

Brennan is not personally harmed Progressive dog Aug 2018 #13

Director Brennan replied that it is part of a broader effort Ponietz Aug 2018 #16

I think this is an important question. TomSlick Aug 2018 #18