Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Kucinich's Brain Afflicted by Cell Phone Radiation Horseshit [View all]Lionel Mandrake
(4,214 posts)15. You want science? Try this.
http://www.cancer.org/Cancer/CancerCauses/OtherCarcinogens/AtHome/cellular-phones
Here are some excerpts:
Here are some excerpts:
the RF waves given off by cell phones don't have enough energy to damage DNA directly or to heat body tissues. Because of this, many scientists believe that cell phones aren't able to cause cancer. Most studies done in the lab have supported this theory, finding that RF waves do not cause DNA damage.
several studies in rats and mice have looked at whether RF energy might promote the development of tumors caused by other known carcinogens (cancer-causing agents). These studies did not find evidence of tumor promotion.
Several dozen studies have looked at possible links between cell phone use and tumors. Most of these studies have focused on brain tumors. Many of these have been case-control studies, in which patients with brain tumors (cases) were compared to people free of brain tumors (controls), in terms of their past cell phone use.
In general, these studies have yielded similar results:
In most studies patients with brain tumors do not report more cell phone use overall than the controls. This finding is true when all brain tumors are considered as a group, or when specific types of tumors are considered.
Most studies do not show a "dose-response relationship," which would be a tendency for the risk of brain tumors to be higher with increasing cell phone use. This would be expected if cell phone use caused brain tumors.
Most studies do not show that brain tumors occur more often on the side of the head where people hold their cell phones. This might also be expected if cell phone use caused brain tumors.
A few studies have found a possible link. For example, several studies published by the same research group in Sweden have reported an increased risk of tumors on the side of the head where the cell phone was held, particularly with 10 or more years of use. It is hard to know what to make of these findings because studies by other researchers have not had the same results, and there is no overall increase in brain tumors in Sweden during the years that correspond to these reports.
several studies in rats and mice have looked at whether RF energy might promote the development of tumors caused by other known carcinogens (cancer-causing agents). These studies did not find evidence of tumor promotion.
Several dozen studies have looked at possible links between cell phone use and tumors. Most of these studies have focused on brain tumors. Many of these have been case-control studies, in which patients with brain tumors (cases) were compared to people free of brain tumors (controls), in terms of their past cell phone use.
In general, these studies have yielded similar results:
In most studies patients with brain tumors do not report more cell phone use overall than the controls. This finding is true when all brain tumors are considered as a group, or when specific types of tumors are considered.
Most studies do not show a "dose-response relationship," which would be a tendency for the risk of brain tumors to be higher with increasing cell phone use. This would be expected if cell phone use caused brain tumors.
Most studies do not show that brain tumors occur more often on the side of the head where people hold their cell phones. This might also be expected if cell phone use caused brain tumors.
A few studies have found a possible link. For example, several studies published by the same research group in Sweden have reported an increased risk of tumors on the side of the head where the cell phone was held, particularly with 10 or more years of use. It is hard to know what to make of these findings because studies by other researchers have not had the same results, and there is no overall increase in brain tumors in Sweden during the years that correspond to these reports.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
42 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
You object to knowing how much radiation is coming that close to your brain...
99Forever
Aug 2012
#1
Yeah, but that's inattentiveness. Lipstick can kill too and not just because I'm drop-dead gorgeous.
Nuclear Unicorn
Aug 2012
#7
he gets paid to say things but not enough apparently to put a cell phone against his own head
KurtNYC
Aug 2012
#37
Interesting. A friend of mine was diagnosed recently with a very rare form of cancer which is
sabrina 1
Aug 2012
#18
I believe it may have been. I had not heard of it before as it is not a common form of cancer, the
sabrina 1
Aug 2012
#41
I think you could have made your case without taking such a swipe at Kucinich.
Raine1967
Aug 2012
#9
You want science? you come with name calling and industry studies but you claim you want science..
KurtNYC
Aug 2012
#10
Thank you. +1. Between the totally fantastic and the completely dogmatic, it gets tiresome. n/t
Egalitarian Thug
Aug 2012
#13
Here from your own source -- "suggestion of a possible increased risk of glioma,"
KurtNYC
Aug 2012
#40
"But ... shortcomings ... prevented them from drawing any firm conclusions"
Lionel Mandrake
Aug 2012
#42
I lived near Slater School in Fresno, Ca.. many had cancer from the powerlines
annm4peace
Aug 2012
#23