Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Jake Tapper/factcheck.org on claims about the Koch Bros funded study on health care costs [View all]ehrnst
(32,640 posts)73. How does this address what CNN and factcheck.org say about what the study actually concluded vs
what AOC and Sanders said it did?
Even the author says so:
Proponents are perfectly free to argue for those provider cuts and to say that THEY believe M4A will therefore lower national health spending, and also to cite whatever data they want in support of their arguments, from any study they find credible, Blahous told us. What they shouldnt say is that I also reached that conclusion, because thats incorrect. That finding should not be attributed to me or to my study.
https://www.factcheck.org/2018/08/the-cost-of-medicare-for-all/
And Tapper said at the end of the video that CNN was not making any comments on MFA - just the difference between what AOC and Sanders said about the study and what the study actually concluded.
If there are any "horses and handgrenades" it's the difference between what the study concluded, and what Sanders and AOC said it concluded.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
134 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Jake Tapper/factcheck.org on claims about the Koch Bros funded study on health care costs [View all]
ehrnst
Aug 2018
OP
Some have lifted small portions of that "study" and isolated sentences to claim, to the effect....
George II
Aug 2018
#1
How does this relate to what Sanders and AOC said about the Koch funded study? (nt)
ehrnst
Aug 2018
#17
No one is disagreeing with any of that, and we are all perfectly aware of it. Your insistence on
Squinch
Aug 2018
#27
What does this have to do with Sanders' and AOC's claims about the conclusions of the study?
ehrnst
Aug 2018
#39
I can be difficult to muster up words beyond that of a bumper-sticker. Nice try, though.
LanternWaste
Aug 2018
#87
You got nothing, otherwise you would have stated something beyond a four-letter word. . . . nt
Bernardo de La Paz
Aug 2018
#101
Nice try. If we want it, we need to work it out. Which is obviously possible to do. But
Squinch
Aug 2018
#7
What exactly? Where did Factcheck.org get it wrong about what Sanders and AOC claimed?
ehrnst
Aug 2018
#19
No, the analysis is that the "Koch Study Was Good Just Left Stuff Out", but...
George II
Aug 2018
#44
Can you direct me to his plan to pay for it, and the progress he's made over the years? TIA.
George II
Aug 2018
#55
You are still just throwing out phrases with no context, and no citations, My Friend.
ehrnst
Aug 2018
#34
Can you give an example of any unaccounted externality in the Mercatus study?
lapucelle
Aug 2018
#111
I heard that a couple of weeks ago from a Democratic Congressional candidate, that "death cost".
George II
Aug 2018
#41
And, you bast*rds, how dare you suggest that the rest of us don't believe healthcare is a right?
Squinch
Aug 2018
#23
It seems to me that this thread is a perfect illustration of the stupidity of the
Squinch
Aug 2018
#31
Was it purists or "realists" that removed the public option and Medicare buy in from the ACA?
Humanist_Activist
Aug 2018
#92
If it was not removed, we would not have gotten the votes to pass ACA in the Senate.
SunSeeker
Aug 2018
#97
Yep - Ted Kennedy thought that we might have something now that is closer to what Canada has
ehrnst
Aug 2018
#124
Was it the purists or the realists that got the first healthcare plan that has ever been passed
Squinch
Aug 2018
#100
It still doesn't cover the general public because of the loopholes that allowed Republicans...
Humanist_Activist
Aug 2018
#103
Where am I blaming Democrats? They did the best they could, we, on the ground...
Humanist_Activist
Aug 2018
#105
That ought to be self evident, but this thread seems to show that to some it isn't.
Squinch
Aug 2018
#128
Horseshoes and hand grenades. Even if it's $2 Trillion more over 10 years, everyone has insurance.
TheBlackAdder
Aug 2018
#46
And if we find it is 2 trillion more, then we can easily do what we need to do to fund it, namely
Squinch
Aug 2018
#49
If we find, it's there at $200B/yr. If it were an increase, we're talking 6.7%. It could be even.
TheBlackAdder
Aug 2018
#52
How does this address what CNN and factcheck.org say about what the study actually concluded vs
ehrnst
Aug 2018
#73
The larger objective should be to get a senate version of HR 676 written and passed.
lapucelle
Aug 2018
#114
This fact checked needs some fact checking. Based on a completely bogus statement.
Nanjeanne
Aug 2018
#50
LOL! Such careful splitting of hairs and obvious word-games means you've already lost the argument.
NurseJackie
Aug 2018
#58
I was referring to the false distinction separating "the American People" from Taxpayers
ehrnst
Aug 2018
#71
As a matter of funding this program - the American people will do so through the Govt.
ehrnst
Aug 2018
#81
But that isn't what Sanders was saying, the American People also pay copays, premiums....
Humanist_Activist
Aug 2018
#77
I know what Tapper said but his conclusion on the accuracy of Sanders and AOC is simply
Nanjeanne
Aug 2018
#76
So you think that the author of the study should not be trusted concerning his conclusions
ehrnst
Aug 2018
#85
Ok I'll try again and then I give up. I think the author of the Koch funded analysis that was based
Nanjeanne
Aug 2018
#88
He starts off with a claim that is not true, neither Sanders nor AOC are talking about saving...
Humanist_Activist
Aug 2018
#78
He says the Koch brothers, who have control over their hiring and firing, didn't influence...
Hassin Bin Sober
Aug 2018
#79
So what is his conclusion, is it going to cost the same, significantly more, or less? N/t
Humanist_Activist
Aug 2018
#91
Where is his evidence for this, even assuming disbursement payments match levels of insurance...
Humanist_Activist
Aug 2018
#95
Throughout this thread the facts - not alternative facts - have been posted. But you know, it's
Nanjeanne
Aug 2018
#106