Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Factcheck.org responds to accusations in a tweetstorm from Senator Sanders re: Mercatus study [View all]JCanete
(5,272 posts)37. Why are we bickering on supporting medicare for all? That's not on him. nt
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
264 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Factcheck.org responds to accusations in a tweetstorm from Senator Sanders re: Mercatus study [View all]
ehrnst
Aug 2018
OP
Unfortunately he doesn't tolerate dissent or any suggestion that he is wrong/mistaken.
ehrnst
Aug 2018
#3
well if your agenda is to make sure he's wrong and mistaken, do better than this or Tapper's lousy
JCanete
Aug 2018
#17
Actually, he is mistaken about what the study concluded, as per the author, and misrepresented what
ehrnst
Aug 2018
#126
okaaay but push-back on a bullshit hit-piece is not not tolerating dissent. It is correcting the
JCanete
Aug 2018
#20
You did not make an argument supported by evidence here. What does not tolerating dissent look like?
JCanete
Aug 2018
#24
So true! I'm seeing it in other topics. The very mild vetting of the touted policies
R B Garr
Aug 2018
#25
Certainly after his outsized response to his claims about the Mercatus study being factchecked. (nt)
ehrnst
Aug 2018
#6
I think that those who got their knickers in a knot over Bernie being factchecked
ehrnst
Aug 2018
#96
What does that have to do with Sanders and AOC misrepresenting the conclusions of the study?
ehrnst
Aug 2018
#107
They didn't debate assumptions, they added more facts to their fact checking.
George II
Aug 2018
#10
Fact checking is what they did:They checked the facts on Sanders' claims about what the study said.
ehrnst
Aug 2018
#11
Well that is outright stupid. They know that Sanders is using a specific instance of the study and
JCanete
Aug 2018
#28
So what are they saying? That was all over the place. They aren't saying Sanders assumptions are
JCanete
Aug 2018
#16
These similar OPs are starting to become mini echo chambers, with the same respondents.
TheBlackAdder
Aug 2018
#19
"Starting" to become? They've been self-congratulatory mini-echo chambers for at least 2 years.
stranger81
Aug 2018
#141
"Same tiny handful of extremely vociferous posters who lose their noodles whenever anyone
betsuni
Aug 2018
#143
"To say the study is "making the case for Medicare for All," as @SenSanders said, is misleading spin
Wwcd
Aug 2018
#30
What context do we need here? When Sanders says " I'd like to thank the Koch brothers of all people
JCanete
Aug 2018
#41
Both arent' equally likely, and one of the reasons for that is how much inforamtion the study does
JCanete
Aug 2018
#89
Well where are they? I'll take what we have over what we don't. I certainly won't use
JCanete
Aug 2018
#102
You haven't shown a mistake. Neither has Tapper or factcheck. you just keep repeating it as
JCanete
Aug 2018
#118
"So while the number Sanders chose really does appear in the report, he's cherry-picked
lapucelle
Aug 2018
#190
Yes it is. There is no one on this thread who does not support universal healthcare.
Squinch
Aug 2018
#38
I don't think you are correct about that actually, from converations I've had here in the past.
JCanete
Aug 2018
#43
Strawman. You are surrounded by left liberals/progressives at DU who support healthcare as a right.
emulatorloo
Aug 2018
#95
No, he never embraced it. Taht's factually incorrect. Taking something out of a hostile
JCanete
Aug 2018
#104
He should declare victory and move on IMHO. He should focus on M4A, not twitter wars
emulatorloo
Aug 2018
#109
People hear a fact check and they take its word for things. YOu have to push back against wrong
JCanete
Aug 2018
#115
That doesn't make any sense. Its vindictive to challenge the veracity or tone of an article or
JCanete
Aug 2018
#251
The factchecking did that. I'm sorry. That's what it did. I never claimed that it is agreeing
JCanete
Aug 2018
#255
ACA is not 100 percent coverage. There is no mechanism that could make it so. What acocunts for it
JCanete
Aug 2018
#250
oh man....I don't have a beef with the ACA. I'm glad it passed. I'm glad it has survived. It is
JCanete
Aug 2018
#260
Now do you understand that the ACA is indeed the furthest along the road to UHC that we
ehrnst
Aug 2018
#261
Dems lost offices for running away from it. It was such a weak front we put up after we passed it,
JCanete
Aug 2018
#46
Oh baloney. And access to healthcare has been part of the Dem message since the 1930s at least. nt
ucrdem
Aug 2018
#48
It isn't a consistent message. We aren't all on the same page. We don't all want the same thing.
JCanete
Aug 2018
#49
I appreciate that this has reached over 100 democratic congresspeople. Taht's something.
JCanete
Aug 2018
#145
what are you talking about? We had an opportunity to pass this sort of thing when
JCanete
Aug 2018
#159
the aca left out 20 million peops and another 40 mil who cant afford touse what they have
questionseverything
Aug 2018
#238
No ehrnst, because the major difference is the actual facts brought to bear in this
JCanete
Aug 2018
#162
No, to say that he misrepresented the conclusions of the study is not disingenuous.
ehrnst
Aug 2018
#164
Welp, there you go. You've apparently read none of my posts regarding this, which
JCanete
Aug 2018
#166
Or...you can just listen to some of our leaders tell you themselves whether or not they
JCanete
Aug 2018
#146
JHan, what did these facts prove to you. That we really are ALL in favor of universal healthcare?
JCanete
Aug 2018
#147
That isn't what I was doing. What was in question was whether or not we all want universal
JCanete
Aug 2018
#155
No, that is not what is in question, "whether or not we all want universal healthcare"
R B Garr
Aug 2018
#175
nice. You couldn't just be having a conversation with an honest actor coming to his own conclusions
JCanete
Aug 2018
#206
ouch such a sting....except that I'm not a Stein supporter and neither was Sanders. The
JCanete
Aug 2018
#219
first of all, I never suggested that people were intentionally propping up the Koch study here,
JCanete
Aug 2018
#253
You don't have to be siding with the Koch's or their agenda to still privilege their talking point
JCanete
Aug 2018
#259
We do have her to thank for that. Too bad the lesson she learned from it is that those chances are
JCanete
Aug 2018
#47
I understand Clinton's reasoning for triangulating on these issues given just how much flak she
JCanete
Aug 2018
#55
It wasn't triangulating as much as living in reality. Do you have a link to where
R B Garr
Aug 2018
#61
except nobody went for all-or-nothing. Who are you referring to? Maybe some Stein supporters.
JCanete
Aug 2018
#65
You made something entirely up that you can't back up. I don't need to parse anything. You made
JCanete
Aug 2018
#80
Show me his all-or-nothing actions. Show me where he said we shouldn't comrpomise for the best
JCanete
Aug 2018
#108
Well, his lashing out at being shown to be wrong on a study conclusion is one example
ehrnst
Aug 2018
#123
Are you joking, putting words in others' mouths, or do you really believe "1+2 equals giraffe"?
Squinch
Aug 2018
#53
Sorry, I was under the impression some said it would never, ever happen. Glad to see
jalan48
Aug 2018
#63
Baseless accusations and desperate attempts to change the topic usually indicate
ehrnst
Aug 2018
#114
First, you're wrong. Nothing is being misinterpreted by Sanders. He's using their own
JCanete
Aug 2018
#69
Is it worth your time and anybody else's here to actually go to bat for the Koch study's hit-job and
JCanete
Aug 2018
#72
Yeah, but whereas you would blame Sanders for that, I'd blame those trying to undermine universal
JCanete
Aug 2018
#82
You think Sanders is above being fact checked and called out when his misrepresents something?
ehrnst
Aug 2018
#91
asked in another thread. what is he misrepresenting? Nobody thinks Sanders is saying
JCanete
Aug 2018
#101
"Thank you, Koch brothers, for accidentally making the case for Medicare for All!" - Bernie
ehrnst
Aug 2018
#214
You avoided all that I said that challenges what you think. He took their best-case attack and
JCanete
Aug 2018
#222
Really? did you read this study? If you really believe there's no wiggle room you should pay
JCanete
Aug 2018
#227
I did not suggest that Factcheck in this case, or Tapper did anything malicious, or that they
JCanete
Aug 2018
#249
The author of the study said that his conclusions were not what Sanders' said they were.
ehrnst
Aug 2018
#88
You think the author would know? That's what yo've got? The author accidentally
JCanete
Aug 2018
#97
Um... are you saying that the author of the study can't be trusted to know his own conclusions
ehrnst
Aug 2018
#106
First of all, the study did not attempt to point out 2 trillion dollars in savings. That was a
JCanete
Aug 2018
#113
I don't think him evil. I think he either has a very strong bias that colors his research and its
JCanete
Aug 2018
#224
You think it was heartfelt? I don't even fucking get it. The ridiculous statements here by some
JCanete
Aug 2018
#229
I just said that he cited it as "showing" something that the author said it didn't.
ehrnst
Aug 2018
#230
no he's not joking about using the study's numbers against it. Even the abstract cites the
JCanete
Aug 2018
#232
the all caps was to empmahsise how loud I thought the point the study was trying to make was,
JCanete
Aug 2018
#234
Haha, no. But, interestingly, if you replace "the Kochs" in your post with "George Soros..."
ehrnst
Aug 2018
#148
I never said you're on their payroll, that's just something you made up to imply I'm nutty.
aidbo
Aug 2018
#167
True this - if he thinks they are as off target and inaccurate as his latest tweets indicate
ehrnst
Aug 2018
#235
Yes because 400 million dollars just won't buy you a platform nowadays with inflation and all,
Uncle Joe
Aug 2018
#239
How does that address the difference between what Sanders said about the study conclusions
ehrnst
Aug 2018
#185
Bernie never used the word "conclusion" this reminds me too much of Trump's continuous use
Uncle Joe
Aug 2018
#189
That part is correct and IT IS IN he study insofar as Blahous was using Bernie's
Uncle Joe
Aug 2018
#194
Blahous' "alternate reality" projections are riddled with mathematical flaws all skewed
Uncle Joe
Aug 2018
#197
Fact check is wrong and misrepresenting what Bernie actually stated and from your
Uncle Joe
Aug 2018
#199
I was going to reply directly to dawg, but your response is better than I came up with.
JHan
Aug 2018
#212
Ah, I see that accusing the media of being "fake news" when they report something about your
ehrnst
Aug 2018
#153
Well, I think that my representation of your assumption is more correct than your representation.
ehrnst
Aug 2018
#173
In other words, you're gonna believe what you want to believe, no matter what I say.
dawg
Aug 2018
#178
I simply said that yes, Obama did not tell the truth about that, and yes, the ramifications were
ehrnst
Aug 2018
#183