Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Showing Original Post only (View all)Trump Tries to Deny His Crime With Cohen, Confesses by Mistake [View all]
http://nymag.com/daily/intelligencer/2018/08/trump-tries-to-deny-crime-with-cohen-confesses-by-mistake.htmlYesterday, President Trumps former lawyer, Michael Cohen, confessed in open court to committing a crime at Trumps direction. The crime is violating campaign finance law, by using Trumps personal funds for a campaign-related expense (paying hush money to his mistresses).
Neither of these statements answers the question of Trumps criminal liability. He did nothing wrong simply changes the question from breaking the law to an undefined definition of wrong which may not overlap with the legal one. (The administration might not consider violating campaign finance law wrong.) The second portion there are no charges against him merely reflects the fact that sitting presidents cant be indicted. Trump could, as they say, shoot somebody on Fifth Avenue, and Sanders could still say he has done nothing wrong and has not been charged with a crime.
Trumps own defense, offered on Fox & Friends, is even more confused. Trump insisted he is in the clear because the payments werent taken out of campaign finance They didnt come out of the campaign, they came from me.
That is not a defense. That is why its a crime. If the money came from the campaign, it would have been legal.
68 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Yep. Fortunately for rump there are a minimum of FORTY FIVE MILLION Americans
Eliot Rosewater
Aug 2018
#27
This Vox article has the 50 second video. If it's campaign related - Either way it's illegal.
underpants
Aug 2018
#5
From my reading/understanding- the source doesn't matter because it was campaign related
underpants
Aug 2018
#30
If the rabbit were related to the campaign, say, a mascot, it would be legal but have to be
Fred Sanders
Aug 2018
#56
Well said...Did the RNC know and approve? Also unindicted co-conspirators?
Fred Sanders
Aug 2018
#57
I doubt a defense of "I was afraid my wife would find out" would work to well though given
cstanleytech
Aug 2018
#41
Thank you- it's simply been policy based on past WH occupants. It's not law.
bettyellen
Aug 2018
#11
I truly think that policy depends on the crime. If he murdered someone on TV no one would argue
bettyellen
Aug 2018
#20
Probably. But it would still take Congress impeaching him to remove him from office.
onenote
Aug 2018
#54
I think congress might change their tune and be amenable to at least threatening to impeach
bettyellen
Aug 2018
#59
Perhaps its time to take the DOJ out from under the executive branch and create one for it?
cstanleytech
Aug 2018
#44
And they want to count this as an "election year" for Mueller but not Kavanaugh's appointment ...
bettyellen
Aug 2018
#47
I'm not sure it's in the system. It's my understanding there's no consensus on this issue.
Garrett78
Aug 2018
#53
big fail presenting as fact the republican claim that sitting presidents can't be indicted.
unblock
Aug 2018
#8