General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: So where will the extra $16 trillion come from to pay for Sanders' plan? [View all]ehrnst
(32,640 posts)So you're basically saying that anyone who disagrees in any way on any point that Senator Sanders makes concerning anything to do with health care is most likely a "shill for big pharma and/or big health care."
Because apparently Senator Sanders is one with and the same as M4A so one can't comment on one without making it a comment on the other, and when one is the only "moral and honest" politician that ever graced capitol hill, any dissent with said politician whatsoever could be understood as an "attack" on "morality, people without healthcare, and could only come from nefarious sources."
Even pointing out that other countries took 60-70 years to get to where they are now, started in a different era and followed and adjusted along side the expansion of medical science and costs, and did not start out as a retrofit of an existing system that was 70 years old makes what they have different than anything that we could do in 8 years is definitely nefarious, and only indicates a resentment against poor people, and a hatred of universal health care.
Did I miss anything?
