Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: 538: What the rise of Kamala Harris tells us about the Democratic Party [View all]Cha
(297,723 posts)92. Mahalo, lapucelle, for explaining the Democratic Party. There are
some really weird ideas out there about what the Dem Party is all about. I can't imagine who's putting those thoughts in their heads?
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
120 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
538: What the rise of Kamala Harris tells us about the Democratic Party [View all]
pnwmom
Aug 2018
OP
Most important thing, she is a Democrat, and is proud to identiy as a DEMOCRAT
still_one
Aug 2018
#3
No, the most important thing is her character, her stands on the issues, and her electability.
LiberalLovinLug
Aug 2018
#76
I do not want people who don't want to be Democrats using the Democratic Party for their own
still_one
Aug 2018
#79
I'm willing to embrace the exception to the rule...if the exception is worth it
LiberalLovinLug
Aug 2018
#81
Please spare me the bullshit of diversity as the Jill Steins and Susan Saradons's, and those other
still_one
Aug 2018
#86
I never mentioned Bernie in my post. I was referring to those self-identified progressives who have
still_one
Aug 2018
#109
The statement that I do want Democrats determining the future of the Democratic party is true, and
still_one
Aug 2018
#114
She has the most liberal voting record of any Democrat (or Independent) in the Senate
NewJeffCT
Aug 2018
#119
Don't push the BS. We wouldn't have lost two SC nominees if those self-identified
still_one
Aug 2018
#104
My added point was the lipinski open primary, where because of that open primary lipinski won over
still_one
Aug 2018
#115
You want to see turnout like you've never seen before? Nominate Harris in 2020
TeamPooka
Aug 2018
#13
Agreed. She's been my choice for over a year now. With Harris, I'm confident we'll crush Trump...
Garrett78
Aug 2018
#24
She is my Senator here in CA and I'm going to support her in the primary if she runs.
TeamPooka
Aug 2018
#12
The Republicans just chose someone who is more "New York" than anyone has been
muriel_volestrangler
Aug 2018
#60
Those were the three highest profile Midwestern primaries in recent weeks. Now what did....
George II
Aug 2018
#82
It didn't work in 2016. Most of the 3rd party voters ditched the party for the general,
pnwmom
Aug 2018
#43
+++++ exactly but you see if they recognize that the Dem party is already a coalition
JHan
Aug 2018
#61
In my city, former Greens and Working Family Party members joined our Democratic Town Committee
femmedem
Aug 2018
#58
If you don't want to be part of the Democratic party, then go join the party of your choice. The
still_one
Aug 2018
#91
Hearty kick and rec! My junior Senator is looking better and better all the time.
Hekate
Aug 2018
#44
"But that view never took hold among party activists. Liberal-leaning women were emboldened to talk
Cha
Aug 2018
#63
Its called DU for a reason... "probably get my vote" LOL Vote for Jill Stein PROBABLY!
winstars
Aug 2018
#80
Twitter - baby photo of Kamala and her mom - posted by Kamala today for Womens Equality Day
womanofthehills
Aug 2018
#90