Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Awsi Dooger

(14,565 posts)
7. Interesting point
Sun Aug 26, 2018, 08:16 PM
Aug 2018

You would think their sweet spot would have been the 1980s and 1990s, turning 50 and 60. But Reagan came along, after nearly swiping the nominating in 1976, and took advantage of Carter's predicament in 1980. Those 8 years were popular enough with the masses to enable an older vice president to succeed, and then a younger charismatic man swooped in and took it away in 1992.

That leads to 8 more years. Now the '30s born are a bit older once it reaches the new century. The '40s kids are taking those nominations early in the century then the '50s are bypassed entirely in favor of early '60s Obama.

I don't think any rationale applies. It just happened that way.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

None born in the 1950s either oberliner Aug 2018 #1
I know. BlueStater Aug 2018 #2
Yes, lord help us, but Mike Pence was born in 1959 oberliner Aug 2018 #3
Wait! He's only 59? GoCubsGo Aug 2018 #5
He doesn't have senility as an excuse. . . nt Bernardo de La Paz Aug 2018 #6
Yes, I had realized this once..... northoftheborder Aug 2018 #4
Interesting point Awsi Dooger Aug 2018 #7
Yep. BlueStater Aug 2018 #8
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Politically wise, people ...»Reply #7