Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

MGKrebs

(8,138 posts)
38. I would think it depends on what wrongdoing he finds.
Mon Aug 27, 2018, 08:34 AM
Aug 2018

If it's just lying on a form or 'inaccurate' testimony, then I would say it just becomes part of his final report. But if he finds something serious, like conspiracy with the Russians, or money laundering, I think he would indict and let the chips fall where they may.

He likely wouldn't indict without (what he feels like is) strong evidence, and I think he would feel compelled to either prosecute or refer serious crimes. In other words, I don't think he would fail to pursue serious crimes because of potential political ramifications. The justice system still has to do it's job even if the political system screws it up later.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Is it Christmas already? BigmanPigman Aug 2018 #1
More like the Fitzmas that never was oberliner Aug 2018 #3
Muller has multiple indictments, multiple guilty pleas and and Manafort just got convicted. emulatorloo Aug 2018 #8
Not of anyone whose last name is Trump oberliner Aug 2018 #9
Sorry, you believed Bush was going to be indicted by Fitgerald? emulatorloo Aug 2018 #11
Fitzmas: "Thinking something will happen based on dubious sources because you really want it to" oberliner Aug 2018 #12
False equivalency and revisionist history. emulatorloo Aug 2018 #13
It's not equivalent - I was just drawing a comparison oberliner Aug 2018 #15
Like Josh Marshall telling us.... demsocialist Aug 2018 #33
Wow, overtime? Kingofalldems Aug 2018 #35
Maybe at the last moment? oberliner Aug 2018 #40
The numerous indictments and guilty pleas seem much less dubious than you imply. LanternWaste Aug 2018 #44
You are right oberliner Aug 2018 #45
Now you contradict your own post 9. :eyes: . . . nt Bernardo de La Paz Aug 2018 #18
You're right oberliner Aug 2018 #42
I join you in being skeptical about sources. Dworkin is a self-promoter first. . . . nt Bernardo de La Paz Aug 2018 #50
That's not a Fitzmas analogy. . . . nt Bernardo de La Paz Aug 2018 #17
Agreed - bad job on my part oberliner Aug 2018 #43
Not analogous. . . nt Bernardo de La Paz Aug 2018 #16
Dubious sources, something we all hope will happen... oberliner Aug 2018 #19
Lol! Squinch Aug 2018 #32
Glad you get a laugh out of it at least! oberliner Aug 2018 #46
Scott Dworkin? oberliner Aug 2018 #2
I know. It's ridiculous people repeatedly post this crap. manor321 Aug 2018 #6
I know we want the Nigerian Prince to send us a million dollars oberliner Aug 2018 #10
Its embarassing. grantcart Aug 2018 #21
A "Resistance" grifter and con artist oberliner Aug 2018 #23
The only think holding me back from believing it is that Roger Stone said the same thing. RockRaven Aug 2018 #4
i don't think there is a chance of mueller going after the royal family Takket Aug 2018 #5
Jr could be indicted by the state of NY and there isn't anything DT could do about it. pnwmom Aug 2018 #25
Not unless they change state law FBaggins Aug 2018 #53
What has Jr been prosecuted for Federally? Nothing. But it's pretty likely he will be charged pnwmom Aug 2018 #55
I would think it depends on what wrongdoing he finds. MGKrebs Aug 2018 #38
Keep repeating it. Odds are one day it will be true. NightWatcher Aug 2018 #7
It may happen, but Dworkin is far from a reliable source. bearsfootball516 Aug 2018 #14
I'm hearing from lots of people this evening ProudLib72 Aug 2018 #20
My cat told ke the same thing yesterday grantcart Aug 2018 #22
My dog was the one who told me! ProudLib72 Aug 2018 #24
They say it's at it's closest point to Earth this year Crutchez_CuiBono Aug 2018 #28
Unfounded rumors. PoindexterOglethorpe Aug 2018 #26
I don't trust anything Dworkin says. Didn't octoberlib Aug 2018 #36
It's not even that Dworkin is saying this, whoever he is. PoindexterOglethorpe Aug 2018 #47
People here tend to be astounded at how easily right wing voters fall for fake news, but... bearsfootball516 Aug 2018 #49
Ain't that the truth?! demmiblue Aug 2018 #56
Roger Stone and Don Jr. Crutchez_CuiBono Aug 2018 #27
Will wait till it happens. If it does, I'll do a little dance. Hoyt Aug 2018 #29
I wear leg braces. zanana1 Aug 2018 #41
I bet the earth will shake, with all the little dances going on. Hoyt Aug 2018 #48
Dworkin thought Jared would be indicted 8 months ago SteveMO Aug 2018 #30
Oy! demmiblue Aug 2018 #34
Before opening the link, Hav Aug 2018 #31
Oh Yes! malaise Aug 2018 #37
Dworkin and a Pharmaceuticals lobbyist. Solid. nt NCTraveler Aug 2018 #39
Scott Dworkin, Dena Grayson and Jon Cooper NewJeffCT Aug 2018 #51
Indeed! demmiblue Sep 2018 #57
Sorry, out until after McCain's buried. Mueller knows his timing. Shrike47 Aug 2018 #52
Watch them clarify, "We mean this *business* week" Recursion Aug 2018 #54
Maybe D_Master81 Sep 2018 #58
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Trump, Jr. to be indicted...»Reply #38