Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: The ignorance of Superdelegates is astounding. We lost 49-1 TWICE in little more than a decade [View all]Adrahil
(13,340 posts)6. Some people are confused by what party nomination processes are.
Some folks seem to think that party nominations should be purely democratic. But they are not, and should not be. They are about the PARTY selecting who could best represent the party in the actual elections. And yes, they means party "establishment" people have an outsized say in the process. That's a feature, not a bug.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
42 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
The ignorance of Superdelegates is astounding. We lost 49-1 TWICE in little more than a decade [View all]
themaguffin
Aug 2018
OP
what are you talking about? what case are you making? What is it about superdelegates you think
JCanete
Aug 2018
#9
You are mistaken. Republicans do have superdelegates. Just not the same as we do it.
LiberalFighter
Aug 2018
#36
That clarification of how most of these supers got their power, that they were once elected to
JCanete
Aug 2018
#39
Do you understand the purpose of the SDs? I really think that you should read about the context of
themaguffin
Aug 2018
#14
What is the context? Why don't you explain it. If you think that the supers should have
JCanete
Aug 2018
#15
I'm sorry, but I can't get any more basic. You are too dug in and not rational. Also it was Mondale
themaguffin
Aug 2018
#16
I noted that it was because of TWO such losses in 12 years that resulted in the
themaguffin
Aug 2018
#22
They were created in response to what happened in the 70s and the Reagan losses
themaguffin
Aug 2018
#24
It opens up more spots for party activists that otherwise would be taken
LiberalFighter
Aug 2018
#40