Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: The ignorance of Superdelegates is astounding. We lost 49-1 TWICE in little more than a decade [View all]JCanete
(5,272 posts)9. what are you talking about? what case are you making? What is it about superdelegates you think
is so important to preserve? The opportunity for the party leadership to decide that another candidate has a better chance at the general, thus flipping the result away from the democratic voters?
The GOP's problem isn't that it didn't have superdelegates, its that it has a farce of a primary process where candiadtes don't speak to issues or set up debates that are intended to actually vet their candidates. They are dog-and-pony shows. This time the dog with the funniest hair-cut and the foulest mouth got the most attention. They own their own garbage.
Are you suggesting that democratic voters can't be trusted in the same way that Republican voters can't be trusted? that we are as easily led by side-shows and away from the issues? As you say but then seem to contradict, we are NOT the GOP.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
42 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
The ignorance of Superdelegates is astounding. We lost 49-1 TWICE in little more than a decade [View all]
themaguffin
Aug 2018
OP
what are you talking about? what case are you making? What is it about superdelegates you think
JCanete
Aug 2018
#9
You are mistaken. Republicans do have superdelegates. Just not the same as we do it.
LiberalFighter
Aug 2018
#36
That clarification of how most of these supers got their power, that they were once elected to
JCanete
Aug 2018
#39
Do you understand the purpose of the SDs? I really think that you should read about the context of
themaguffin
Aug 2018
#14
What is the context? Why don't you explain it. If you think that the supers should have
JCanete
Aug 2018
#15
I'm sorry, but I can't get any more basic. You are too dug in and not rational. Also it was Mondale
themaguffin
Aug 2018
#16
I noted that it was because of TWO such losses in 12 years that resulted in the
themaguffin
Aug 2018
#22
They were created in response to what happened in the 70s and the Reagan losses
themaguffin
Aug 2018
#24
It opens up more spots for party activists that otherwise would be taken
LiberalFighter
Aug 2018
#40