Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

woodsprite

(12,577 posts)

1. If that was a requirement of the job and wasn't mentioned up front before he accepted the job

Reply to left-of-center2012 (Original post)

Thu Aug 30, 2018, 02:47 PM

Aug 2018

I would still think he'd have a case.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

10 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Oregon construction worker fired for refusing to attend Bible study [View all] left-of-center2012 Aug 2018 OP

If that was a requirement of the job and wasn't mentioned up front before he accepted the job woodsprite Aug 2018 #1

even if it was clear up front it's still blatant discrimination. unblock Aug 2018 #3

Not sure what is meant by that. haele Aug 2018 #6

paying those who agree while discriminating against those who don't doesn't make it legal. unblock Aug 2018 #2

Right. The idea that they paid him as making a difference is weird onenote Aug 2018 #4

indeed. of course in practice, they're not paying the jewish employee because he quit. unblock Aug 2018 #5

Slam dunk lawsuit. BSdetect Aug 2018 #7

I said in the other thread about this... Initech Aug 2018 #8

Mr. Dahl's about to "render unto Caesar", bigly 0rganism Aug 2018 #9

I hope the lawsuit takes the fucking company down manor321 Aug 2018 #10

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Oregon construction worke...»Reply #1