Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

DetlefK

(16,670 posts)
6. He's essentially advocating a gig-economy, but on a municipal level.
Mon Sep 3, 2018, 07:06 AM
Sep 2018
Katz and Nowak highlight “networked governance” that taps a broad array of civic actors—including universities, philanthropies, non-profits, and business groups as well as multiple local jurisdictions—to get things done. Local knowledge, cross-sector collaboration and unlocking private capital are key to the New Localism’s success.


He thinks the key is to isolate players even more from each other. While this will increase flexibility, it will also decrease the political power.

Small, agile, fast. But what will it mean for the big picture?

For example:
What will happen if each city makes their own healthcare-policy?
Their own minimum-wage policy?
Their own environmental policy?
Their own regulations with respect to predatory forms of capitalism?

Do you really think that we can implement progressive policies when each city has to fight Big Pharma and Big Telecom and Wall Street and the Koch brothers on its own?

Your church's soup-kitchen won't look so good when a big company rolls into town and promises jobs in exchange for taxpayer-money and being exempt from regulations.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»"Centrist Progressive" tr...»Reply #6