Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Showing Original Post only (View all)
 

ehrnst

(32,640 posts)
Wed Sep 5, 2018, 10:07 AM Sep 2018

FiveThirtyEight's analysis of Ayanna Pressley's win. [View all]

Last edited Wed Sep 5, 2018, 10:41 AM - Edit history (3)

It didn’t come out of nowhere. Everyone knew this would be a competitive race. The district was publicly polled at least three times (i.e. pollsters thought it worth surveying). Capuano spent more than $1.7 million on his defense, spurred in part by the knowledge that Pressley was deploying $767,000 of her own. Both sides aired television ads. An “upset” it may have been, but it should not have “stunned” anyone who was paying attention.

It wasn’t progressive vs. moderate. Pressley herself said that there was little daylight between her and Capuano on the issues. Capuano has a -.580 DW-Nominate score,1 making him the most liberal Democrat in the Massachusetts delegation and well to the left of Crowley. Meanwhile, more moderate Democrats like Rep. Richard Neal in Massachusetts’s 1st District and Rep. Stephen Lynch in the 8th District won their primaries by 40 and 47 percentage points, respectively. Ideology doesn’t explain Capuano’s loss.

It wasn’t insider vs. outsider. Pressley has been an at-large city councilor in Boston, the district’s largest city, for nine years. Before that, she worked for 16 years as a congressional aide to the most establishment Democrats imaginable, Joe Kennedy II and John Kerry. She won a rising star award from Emily’s List in 2015. She was no political newbie like Ocasio-Cortez and in fact was a well-credentialed political insider.

It (probably) wasn’t just white vs. nonwhite. Because of the 7th District’s dark-blue hue, Pressley is extremely likely to become the first woman of color to represent Massachusetts in Congress. People will be quick to connect that to the fact that non-Hispanic whites are a minority (42 percent) of the 7th District’s total population. However, non-Hispanic whites make up 55 percent of registered voters in the district, so it probably wasn’t just that nonwhites voted for Pressley and whites voted for Capuano. (This was also probably true of Ocasio-Cortez and Crowley, by the way.) This is apparent from the town-by-town results: Chelsea, which is just 23 percent non-Hispanic white, voted 54-46 for Capuano, while the aforementioned Somerville — 70 percent non-Hispanic white, 58 percent under the age of 35 — voted for Capuano just 50.4-49.6. We’ll have to wait for precinct-level results to know for sure, but it looks like Pressley cinched her victory by winning young, college-educated white voters.


https://fivethirtyeight.com/features/why-ayanna-pressleys-upset-win-in-massachusetts-isnt-really-like-alexandria-ocasio-cortezs/

And kudos to the tried and true EMILY's list for their support!

https://www.emilyslist.org/news/entry/boston-magazine-bostons-most-powerful-people-ayanna-pressley


She also had the support of her peers - which says so much about how effective she is at working with people to get things done:

Pressley hasn’t been endorsed by any of her potential peers in the Massachusetts delegation. Sens. Elizabeth Warren and Ed Markey and Reps. Niki Tsongas and Seth Moulton have remained neutral in the race, while the state’s other six House members have backed Capuano.

Pressley does, however, have the backing of a number of her current peers — city councilors Annissa Essaibi George, Michelle Wu, and Kim Janey — as well as a large group of state and local lawmakers and progressive groups in the Boston area. At the national level, both the grassroots anti-Trump group Indivisible and the National Women’s Political Caucus have officially backed Pressley.

Perhaps her biggest endorsement came from Massachusetts Attorney General Maura Healey, a fellow ascendant Bay State Democrat, who said the two women have a long history of working together “on issues that strike at the core of who we are as a city and a state and reflect the progress we still need to make.”

“I’ve been lucky to work with some incredible people, but just a few have been willing to lean in every time,” Healey said. “One of these people for me is Ayanna.”

Pressley also was recently endorsed by the editorial boards of the two biggest newspapers in Massachusetts: The Boston Globe and the Boston Herald.


https://www.boston.com/news/politics/2018/08/31/ayanna-pressley-massachusetts-primary

And once again, another young leader who was a Clinton surrogate in 2016 makes good:

She joins a growing group of younger, progressive Democrats -- often women and people of color -- to win competitive primaries, a week after Tallahassee Mayor Andrew Gillum, 39, became the first black person to win a major party's nomination for governor in Florida.


https://www.cnn.com/2018/09/04/politics/massachusetts-primary-democratic-direction/index.html
64 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Young people voting for a younger person, IOW? BeyondGeography Sep 2018 #1
Kind Of Looks Like That ProfessorGAC Sep 2018 #3
America is the land of opportunity BeyondGeography Sep 2018 #5
You know she's a Democrat, right? ehrnst Sep 2018 #7
You know Capuano just lost his job, right? BeyondGeography Sep 2018 #9
Yes.. so why is this evidence that the Democratic party isn't doing well?(nt) ehrnst Sep 2018 #10
President Trump? R's controlling the House and Senate? The SC hijacking? BeyondGeography Sep 2018 #11
So Trump is the reason that Mass chose Pressley? ehrnst Sep 2018 #12
She doesn't even run if Hillary is President BeyondGeography Sep 2018 #16
Um... She was a Clinton surrogate in 2016. ehrnst Sep 2018 #19
She doesn't primary Capuano BeyondGeography Sep 2018 #20
You seem to be ignoring the contents of my posts. ehrnst Sep 2018 #22
++++++ JHan Sep 2018 #25
Hillary has been invaluble in helping Cha Sep 2018 #23
+1000 (nt) ehrnst Sep 2018 #24
Apparently Stacy Abrams didn't have a political career or future until HRC lost. JHan Sep 2018 #26
It's blatantly stupid. Cha Sep 2018 #64
Agreed Gothmog Sep 2018 #49
she wouldn't have run for *this* if HRC was president b/c there would be no margin in fishwax Sep 2018 #27
I suspect you're correct zipplewrath Sep 2018 #29
You think that neither Abrams nor Woodfin nor Pressley would have run for office ehrnst Sep 2018 #32
Potentially zipplewrath Sep 2018 #33
LMAO! BeyondGeography Sep 2018 #43
Pressley was politicially active in HRC's campaign. You believe that she would have not ehrnst Sep 2018 #36
She may have joined the administration zipplewrath Sep 2018 #41
So you think that the reason she won is because Trump? ehrnst Sep 2018 #30
I think the reason she took the chance to run against Capuano is because trump in the white house fishwax Sep 2018 #39
The problem with your analysis is the association of incumbents with establishment stooges. JHan Sep 2018 #28
He lost by double-digits...Ask yourself why are good, long-term incumbents so vulnerable this year? BeyondGeography Sep 2018 #57
On what do you base your analysis? ehrnst Sep 2018 #58
There's a difference in representation but not policies, yes finally we're seeing it.. JHan Sep 2018 #60
And good Democrat Pressley got it. That's the way Hortensis Sep 2018 #55
Nonsensical...Do you read threads or just individual posts? BeyondGeography Sep 2018 #56
I apologize for confusing you with all those here who Hortensis Sep 2018 #59
Not just his job, but his standing. joshcryer Sep 2018 #63
I Suppose ProfessorGAC Sep 2018 #8
Thank you. Neither do I... NurseJackie Sep 2018 #18
Generational change zipplewrath Sep 2018 #31
But you were the one who said she wouldn't even have run, let alone win if not for Trump winning. ehrnst Sep 2018 #35
Not sure I did zipplewrath Sep 2018 #37
There are benefits to having more representation that isn't mythology Sep 2018 #40
Not Sure I Said That, But I Also Agree ProfessorGAC Sep 2018 #48
Second Reply ProfessorGAC Sep 2018 #13
I'm with you. Why are we going after progressives in safe seats? LisaM Sep 2018 #54
Yup. joshcryer Sep 2018 #62
I don't see how this one is a shock to anyone. NCTraveler Sep 2018 #2
I've seen that. Along with... NurseJackie Sep 2018 #17
Interesting comments... Wounded Bear Sep 2018 #4
It's not only the mainstream media trying to stoke the "civil war" ehrnst Sep 2018 #6
You say that as if every time an Our Revolution candidate loses mythology Sep 2018 #42
"You say that as if..." ehrnst Sep 2018 #46
DSA is taking credit for the win too?! JHan Sep 2018 #45
Yep. (nt) ehrnst Sep 2018 #47
What did this group do in this election? Gothmog Sep 2018 #50
Good analysis of this race Gothmog Sep 2018 #14
Stay calm and Get Out the Vote. . . . nt Bernardo de La Paz Sep 2018 #15
K&R Gothmog Sep 2018 #21
This is not a cataclysmic event! at140 Sep 2018 #34
K&R for visibility. lunamagica Sep 2018 #38
Holy facts and statistics, Batman! What will click-seeking headline writers do with facts? Fred Sanders Sep 2018 #44
She won GOTV, don't diss her for doing saidsimplesimon Sep 2018 #51
Good post. And a good Democratic win between two good Hortensis Sep 2018 #52
K&R ismnotwasm Sep 2018 #53
Good analysis. brer cat Sep 2018 #61
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»FiveThirtyEight's analysi...