Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: FiveThirtyEight's analysis of Ayanna Pressley's win. [View all]NurseJackie
(42,862 posts)17. I've seen that. Along with...
One take even foolishly claims it was a challenge from the left.
I've seen that. Along with all the absurdly hyperbolic characterizations of her win being a "massive shift!" and "earth-shattering!" or "there's something happening here" ... good grief!
What I'm trying to say is that what they want, what they think they see, how they characterize it, frequently have no bearing on reality. Kinda like Cenk Uygur's "Justice Democrats" claim responsibility for her victory after having provided zero financial support. The reality is that she's about as mainstream as it gets. It really serves no good purpose to try and make her win more important than it really is.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
64 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
President Trump? R's controlling the House and Senate? The SC hijacking?
BeyondGeography
Sep 2018
#11
she wouldn't have run for *this* if HRC was president b/c there would be no margin in
fishwax
Sep 2018
#27
You think that neither Abrams nor Woodfin nor Pressley would have run for office
ehrnst
Sep 2018
#32
Pressley was politicially active in HRC's campaign. You believe that she would have not
ehrnst
Sep 2018
#36
I think the reason she took the chance to run against Capuano is because trump in the white house
fishwax
Sep 2018
#39
The problem with your analysis is the association of incumbents with establishment stooges.
JHan
Sep 2018
#28
He lost by double-digits...Ask yourself why are good, long-term incumbents so vulnerable this year?
BeyondGeography
Sep 2018
#57
There's a difference in representation but not policies, yes finally we're seeing it..
JHan
Sep 2018
#60
But you were the one who said she wouldn't even have run, let alone win if not for Trump winning.
ehrnst
Sep 2018
#35
Holy facts and statistics, Batman! What will click-seeking headline writers do with facts?
Fred Sanders
Sep 2018
#44