Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

unblock

(52,095 posts)
20. it would be improper for them to give a definitive "i would decide this way"
Wed Sep 5, 2018, 03:12 PM
Sep 2018

but it would not at all be unethical for them to talk about relevant precedents, relevant clauses under the constitution, etc.

there's quite a lot one can discuss about how one might analyze a hypothetical without prejudging any particular future case.

you just have to be careful with your caveats.

this is basic, first-year law school stuff, really.

We saw this coming SHRED Sep 2018 #1
This Process Is So Bogus And All For Show..... global1 Sep 2018 #7
Yeah, Roe is gone. Lots more. For a generation at least, but Eliot Rosewater Sep 2018 #2
Row, Griswold, Lawrence...Skinner v Oklahoma (modified Buck V Bell on forced sterilization) haele Sep 2018 #9
Seems bad, but just think how bad it would be if we had someone who gave ONE speech once. Eliot Rosewater Sep 2018 #11
The real dirt on Kavanaugh is under lock and key. Vinca Sep 2018 #3
Yep, America is gone, for good. We might survive in some fashion, but the America our Eliot Rosewater Sep 2018 #12
Stolen emails? sarah FAILIN Sep 2018 #15
Welcome to the scotus nomination process FBaggins Sep 2018 #4
It's not the answer they "should" give, unblock Sep 2018 #6
Yet none of the existing SCOTUS justices agree with you FBaggins Sep 2018 #18
it would be improper for them to give a definitive "i would decide this way" unblock Sep 2018 #20
If nobody can ask any questions or get any information from SCOTUS nominees Proud Liberal Dem Sep 2018 #24
Also, it's not hypothetical. unblock Sep 2018 #5
One Could Answer A Hypothetical With A Discussion..... global1 Sep 2018 #8
exactly. if you remove hypotheticals, and also remove live cases, then unblock Sep 2018 #19
That makes it worse FBaggins Sep 2018 #21
no no no. i'm not saying he should opine on any actual case unblock Sep 2018 #22
Realistically unless somebody connects the dots to Russian oligarchs NotASurfer Sep 2018 #10
I can't stand Faux pas Sep 2018 #13
Not sure which "him" you're talking about............ MyOwnPeace Sep 2018 #14
All of them really Faux pas Sep 2018 #17
Eventually, if confirmed, Kavanaugh will be impeached and this is laying the groundwork Pachamama Sep 2018 #16
Curious.......Impeached on what grounds? WillowTree Sep 2018 #23
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»So All Those Questions Th...»Reply #20