Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Tavarious Jackson

(1,595 posts)

15. I saw Michael Avenatti tweet about this

Reply to SHRED (Original post)

Mon Sep 10, 2018, 11:28 AM

Sep 2018

It's a good motivator for candidate to use.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

38 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

What is the process for adding more justices to the SCOTUS? [View all] SHRED Sep 2018 OP

Simple majority vote of the House and Senate... brooklynite Sep 2018 #1

2020 I hope SHRED Sep 2018 #4

january 20, 2021, technically. unblock Sep 2018 #5

Republicans change the Senate rules at the drop of a hat, to suit their purposes shanny Sep 2018 #6

that's why i said "as the rules stand now" unblock Sep 2018 #9

I think the filibuster was anti-democratic from the git, and should have been gone long ago. shanny Sep 2018 #18

the filibuster is a mixed bag. unblock Sep 2018 #20

"we" can't get rid of it now; only they can shanny Sep 2018 #21

i'm very worried about what they'll do in a lame duck session. unblock Sep 2018 #22

I hear you, but I don't worry about things I can't stop. shanny Sep 2018 #23

thing is, blue wave 2018 only helps us slow them down. unblock Sep 2018 #24

As I said, the only way out is through. shanny Sep 2018 #30

50% plus one vote would certainly win, but only a plurality is required in nearly all the states. nt sl8 Sep 2018 #25

Good point. shanny Sep 2018 #29

This is the real problem Buckeyeblue Sep 2018 #37

I agree, on all counts. nt shanny Sep 2018 #38

The President nominates somebody Goodheart Sep 2018 #2

That's my take on it too. I know FDR tried to increase the number but they swatted shraby Sep 2018 #3

He didn't need to. shanny Sep 2018 #7

Yep. His threat made the New Deal possible without court interference dalton99a Sep 2018 #33

Debunked history onenote Sep 2018 #34

The process is difficult. That's what it is. MineralMan Sep 2018 #8

Packing the court will have to wait. Historic NY Sep 2018 #10

What problem is this the solution for? guillaumeb Sep 2018 #11

The Democrats Would Never Do That LandOfHopeAndDreams Sep 2018 #12

First things first! We need to get past the mid-terms and get control in House and Senate. Totally Tunsie Sep 2018 #28

Impeach them. Johnny2X2X Sep 2018 #13

Impeach for what? mythology Sep 2018 #14

Kavanaugh for lying to Congress eleny Sep 2018 #17

Congress can impeach for just about anything shanny Sep 2018 #19

Impeachment requires a two-thirds majority in the Senate. Expansion requires only a simple majority dalton99a Sep 2018 #32

You think there are going to be 67 Democratic senators in 2021? onenote Sep 2018 #35

I saw Michael Avenatti tweet about this Tavarious Jackson Sep 2018 #15

Don't be too eager. DFW Sep 2018 #16

Bad Idea irresistable Sep 2018 #26

Brilliant! Thus giving Trump 2 MORE nominees! jberryhill Sep 2018 #27

We'll have to figure out some way to neutralize the judges that Trump has appointed. Crunchy Frog Sep 2018 #31

At the district court level, most of Trump's nominees have been approved unanimously onenote Sep 2018 #36