Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Spot the difference: One is "arguing a strike. One is "having a meltdown." [View all]Quixote1818
(31,154 posts)13. Her anger was what is called "Moral outrage" because she was treated unfairly compared to a man
doing the exact same thing. She actually has a right to be extremely upset about this. Being upset by a missed call by an umpire in baseball in a sport where men are treated equally is just being upset over a missed call. I would argue she has a much, much, much stronger case to be angry, even be irate. If you were treated differently than someone else would you not feel moral outrage?
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/ejsp.434
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
46 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Spot the difference: One is "arguing a strike. One is "having a meltdown." [View all]
ehrnst
Sep 2018
OP
Her anger was what is called "Moral outrage" because she was treated unfairly compared to a man
Quixote1818
Sep 2018
#13
...we should pay attention to what President Obama says about logical fallacies and electronic
Fred Sanders
Sep 2018
#17
Which logical fallacy is being applied this thread? I have at least three....
Fred Sanders
Sep 2018
#20
You get ejected from the game for arguing balls and strikes with the umpire.
Calista241
Sep 2018
#45