General Discussion

Response to CentralMass (Reply #30)

Post removed

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

66 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Dianne Feinstein silenced Kavanaugh's accuser to protect the status quo [View all] red dog 1 Sep 2018 OP

I'm still voting for her. Iliyah Sep 2018 #1

I wasn't going to vote for her anyway David__77 Sep 2018 #2

I just sent an email to Sen. Feinstein expressing my disappointment with the way she handled red dog 1 Sep 2018 #21

Post removed Post removed Sep 2018 #3

Some are REALLY anal-rententive idcdu Sep 2018 #7

O.k., but what about this thread OP ? Trust Buster Sep 2018 #11

This message was self-deleted by its author Eliot Rosewater Sep 2018 #12

I am not a fan of all the alerts. I have no problem with reasonable criticism of a democrat. Trust Buster Sep 2018 #14

This message was self-deleted by its author Eliot Rosewater Sep 2018 #15

I know how you feel. airplaneman Sep 2018 #38

Sit back, watch the boards, add those who seem to be more negative to you to your Jury Blacklist. TheBlackAdder Sep 2018 #42

FFS. She released it at the 11th hour so it would leave doubt in people's minds, and the RW still_one Sep 2018 #4

That Sounds Plausible To Me Me. Sep 2018 #10

It was also sent to Anna Eshoo still_one Sep 2018 #18

But she's an older woman, an "establishment'' Democrat, so for some she's fair game for criticism... George II Sep 2018 #17

... Me. Sep 2018 #26

It is just an excuse. It wasn't that long ago some were upset that impeachment wasn't actively still_one Sep 2018 #31

I don't know. The OP says she only released it because the "Intercept" outed it. brush Sep 2018 #29

The text belies the dishonest title. Smear? Hortensis Sep 2018 #5

Vox loves to try and divide Democrats and this "status quo" bullshit makes no sense... bettyellen Sep 2018 #8

This message was self-deleted by its author Eliot Rosewater Sep 2018 #13

fuck this shit Eliot Rosewater Sep 2018 #9

No, the status quo being referenced is the old tacit agreement to pretend that an elected or tblue37 Sep 2018 #48

Tblue, please think. There was no private behavior here. Hortensis Sep 2018 #49

I am not making that reference. I am just describing what the article references as the tblue37 Sep 2018 #50

Okay, sure. Btw, Jeff Flake now opposes "quick confirmation"! Hortensis Sep 2018 #53

I will believe Flake when he does more than just talk. He hasn't yet, so I don't tblue37 Sep 2018 #56

That occurred to me also. We'll see. Hortensis Sep 2018 #62

The New Yorker "reported" an opinion based on speculation. lapucelle Sep 2018 #55

That seems to be inexcusable and unconscionable CentralMass Sep 2018 #6

The article or the unsubstantiated speculation about Feinstein's motives? George II Sep 2018 #20

The New Yorker is credible, and I don't care what her motives were for keeping this to herself. CentralMass Sep 2018 #30

Post removed Post removed Sep 2018 #32

Well, isn't that a problem? When Sen. Feinstein's motives Hortensis Sep 2018 #35

I salute and applaud you for a well thought out, reasonable post. john657 Sep 2018 #36

I don't know what your end game is, but...... George II Sep 2018 #16

I have a pretty good idea. NurseJackie Sep 2018 #19

this is a really bad take. JHan Sep 2018 #22

What f*cking drivel. nt DURHAM D Sep 2018 #23

From the New York Times article of September 14, 2018, by Jane Mayer and Ronan Farrow: red dog 1 Sep 2018 #24

Weird word parsing there w the "taken care of it" seems like they're trying to make her motives look bettyellen Sep 2018 #28

"DiFi: a secret mole for Trump? Coming up next on Vox News! struggle4progress Sep 2018 #25

Do you have a link for that? red dog 1 Sep 2018 #33

Same place the title "Dianne Feinstein silenced Kavanaugh's accuser to protect the status quo" ehrnst Sep 2018 #37

"Same place the title "Dianne Feinstein silenced Kavanaugh's accuser to protect the status quo" red dog 1 Sep 2018 #39

Yes, I have a link to that headline. ehrnst Sep 2018 #43

I'll ask again... Do you have a link for that or not? red dog 1 Sep 2018 #40

It's over on JPR. yardwork Sep 2018 #44

What's JPR? red dog 1 Sep 2018 #45

A nice linkie for ya: struggle4progress Sep 2018 #46

So, it appears that you do NOT have a link to back up your claim. red dog 1 Sep 2018 #47

A nice linkie for ya: red dog 1 Sep 2018 #61

"WATCH Vox News?" red dog 1 Sep 2018 #51

Less than two months before our critical midterms, I see no upside to attacking Dems, struggle4progress Sep 2018 #63

So Feinstein wants to protect the "status quo" of Trump, McConnell, and Kavanaugh?? Bleacher Creature Sep 2018 #27

The Vox article title implies that Feinstein "wants to protect the 'status quo' of red dog 1 Sep 2018 #34

I agree with you about the "framing" red dog 1 Sep 2018 #41

Disgusting OP ! stonecutter357 Sep 2018 #52

What right do senators have to keep information from the people?? Grasswire2 Sep 2018 #54

Excellent question! red dog 1 Sep 2018 #58

If a male senator withheld the letter there would be#metoo hell to pay. Sneederbunk Sep 2018 #57

This Post K & R x 1000! Va Lefty Sep 2018 #59

damned straight Grasswire2 Sep 2018 #60

"Status Quo" is so 2016. ismnotwasm Sep 2018 #64

Feinstein honored Ford's request to keep her allegation confidential, but regrettably others did not phleshdef Sep 2018 #65

Kick... SidDithers Sep 2018 #66