General Discussion

Hortensis

(58,785 posts)

41. Yes, and we already had many proofs of that. This is

Sun Sep 16, 2018, 02:48 PM

Sep 2018

frankly prurient sensationalism until people examine what evidence turns up. But it's grabbing attention, and hopefully it'll get through to those who were so far unreached by proofs of his severe moral, ethical, and ideological unfitness. We're coming down to the wire here.

Fwow, I also have no problem believing a jock with this man's proven vicious, aggressive streak and bad character might have attempted rape. If he did, wonder if he knew while drunk that that bathing suit was under her clothes. I remember struggling to get them on and off. They'd buy time as an initial rape barrier.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

67 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Kavanaugh accuser speaks out: [View all] Kingofalldems Sep 2018 OP

She needs to get to testify Gothmog Sep 2018 #1

How would that work? The confirmation hearings are over. Demit Sep 2018 #9

They were over when Hill accused Thomas too FBaggins Sep 2018 #15

What part of the accuser did not want Feinstein to make it public DURHAM D Sep 2018 #18

Both indict Feinstein's judgement FBaggins Sep 2018 #19

Thanks man for explaining DURHAM D Sep 2018 #21

I understood it was her name she didn't want made public - not the accusation Bradshaw3 Sep 2018 #26

That's not what Feinstein's communications director says FBaggins Sep 2018 #31

Ok, thanks Bradshaw3 Sep 2018 #32

You asked a question and I answered it... now that's mansplaining? FBaggins Sep 2018 #29

Not at all. Perfect strategy. First the victim did not want her name used. still_one Sep 2018 #61

She did ask questions, didn't she? That's why Kavanaugh denied it? nt Honeycombe8 Sep 2018 #52

She asked something about sexual assault in the hearings? FBaggins Sep 2018 #57

Oh. I guess she couldn't ask, because she couldn't identify the accuser. nt Honeycombe8 Sep 2018 #60

They re-opened the hearings for Anita Hill and can do so again Gothmog Sep 2018 #16

Back then, the Democrats were in the majority, john657 Sep 2018 #34

They won't do it. Mr.Bill Sep 2018 #35

Not by the minority party they can't. Demit Sep 2018 #38

They can reconvene. triron Sep 2018 #51

The Republicans run the show. What makes you think they'd reconvene? Demit Sep 2018 #58

She needs personal security. TNNurse Sep 2018 #50

Whoa! Here we go! She's got her therapist's notes! PearliePoo2 Sep 2018 #2

Ooh. Awesome. triron Sep 2018 #53

I hope she can testify if she chooses to... steve2470 Sep 2018 #3

I want to thank her for going public manor321 Sep 2018 #4

I have a feeling she will testify BigmanPigman Sep 2018 #5

"While his friend watched" dalton99a Sep 2018 #6

Washington Post article; "Ford said she Hortensis Sep 2018 #7

Holy Shit malaise Sep 2018 #10

Yes, and we already had many proofs of that. This is Hortensis Sep 2018 #41

This is a great article by the Washington Post Gothmog Sep 2018 #17

She took a polygraph and passed! PearliePoo2 Sep 2018 #8

I admire this woman's courage and sense of responsibility. NoSmoke Sep 2018 #36

Kavanaugh in trouble now, GOP can no longer attack an anonymous letter but there is now a face to it sunonmars Sep 2018 #11

Much worse than I expected from the bits leaking out Ms. Toad Sep 2018 #12

Now we know why the GOP had that "letter" ready to back him....They knew he was a predator. sunonmars Sep 2018 #13

And, had apparently already talked to Judge, from the WAPO article. Ms. Toad Sep 2018 #22

I don't know. It's not exactly a case of "I thought no meant maybe." Demit Sep 2018 #45

I'm not suggestion it ws a misunderstood signal. Ms. Toad Sep 2018 #62

She passed an FBI polygraph! Tavarious Jackson Sep 2018 #14

Good question!! I think the answer is obvious. InAbLuEsTaTe Sep 2018 #23

Not an FBI polygraph, john657 Sep 2018 #37

Thanks Tavarious Jackson Sep 2018 #42

From MSNBC Gothmog Sep 2018 #20

Different rules apply... Guilded Lilly Sep 2018 #24

You're probably right. But I hope not. dchill Sep 2018 #54

Me, too, dchill, One of them has to be the magic turning point! Guilded Lilly Sep 2018 #63

Post removed Post removed Sep 2018 #25

Feinstein did nothing wrong. phleshdef Sep 2018 #33

That's simply not true FBaggins Sep 2018 #43

You are misinformed as to how this went down. phleshdef Sep 2018 #44

She said that shouldn't be the reason LostinRed Sep 2018 #46

Seconded. This accusation was going nowhere without the accuser. bettyellen Sep 2018 #47

I don't think she will be the last to come out with accusations about this judge. ooky Sep 2018 #27

That's what I think it would take FBaggins Sep 2018 #39

My fear is that the other women he has attacked Ilsa Sep 2018 #49

GOP confirming him at this point is actual, physical war on America Eliot Rosewater Sep 2018 #28

Just another repub creep Bradshaw3 Sep 2018 #30

K&R Scurrilous Sep 2018 #40

She took a polygraph. Has it in therapists' notes twice years ago. And now begins the retaliation... Honeycombe8 Sep 2018 #48

I don't I ever knew any male friend in high school or college that would go there. triron Sep 2018 #55

k&r Demovictory9 Sep 2018 #56

I admire her bravery DesertRat Sep 2018 #59

I understand her fear and wanting to remain anonymous initially. DangerousRhythm Sep 2018 #64

K&R UTUSN Sep 2018 #65

If this man is confirmed we need to impeach him Kingofalldems Sep 2018 #66

This will come up Gothmog Sep 2018 #67