Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Showing Original Post only (View all)Social Security [View all]
If you support cutting Social Security, you're not a Democrat.
If you lie about Democrats wanting to cut Social Security, you're not a Democrat.
If you are demagoguing the issue of Social Security, you're not a Democrat.
Those are Republican positions and actions.
The President makes a lot of speeches on the subject, sometimes he simply mentions the program and sometimes he's specific.
THE PRESIDENT: Well, first -- this is a very well-informed young man here. (Laughter.) Youre exactly right that the way the Social Security system works, theres whats called -- theres basically a cap on your Social Security, which there isnt, by the way, on Medicare. But Social Security, it only goes up to the first $107,000; and youre right, somebody who makes -- who has net assets of $250 million and are making maybe $5 million a year just on interest or capital gains or something, just a fraction of its going to Social Security. I think theres a way for us to make adjustments on the Social Security tax that would be fairer than the system that we use right now.
http://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2011/08/17/remarks-president-town-hall-meeting-alpha-illinois
http://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2011/08/17/remarks-president-town-hall-meeting-alpha-illinois
But the fixes that are required for Social Security are not huge, the way they are with Medicare. Medicare, that is a real problem. If we don't get a handle on it, it will bankrupt us. With Social Security, we could make adjustments to the payroll tax. For example -- I'll just give you one example -- right now, your Social Security -- your payroll tax is capped at $109,000. So what that means is, is that -- how many people -- I don't mean to pry into your business, but how many people here make less than $109,000 every year? (Laughter.) All right, this is a pretty rich audience -- a lot of people kept their hands down. (Laughter.) I'm impressed. (Laughter.)
No, look, what it means is basically for 95 percent of Americans, they pay -- every dollar you earn, you pay into the payroll tax. But think about that other 5 percent that's making more than $109,000 a year. Warren Buffett, he pays the payroll tax on the first $109,000 he makes, and then for the other $10 billion -- (laughter) -- he doesn't pay payroll tax.
So -- yes, somebody said, "What?" (Laughter.) Yes, that's right. That's the way it works.
So what we've said is, well, don't we -- doesn't it make sense to maybe have that payroll tax cut off at a higher level, or have people -- maybe you hold people harmless till they make $250,000 a year, but between $250,000 and a million or something, they start paying payroll tax again -- just to make sure that the fund overall is solvent.
So that would just be one example. That's not the only way of fixing it, but if you made a slight adjustment like that, then Social Security would be there well into the future and it would be fine. All right? (Applause.)
http://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/remarks-president-town-hall-meeting-henderson-nevada
No, look, what it means is basically for 95 percent of Americans, they pay -- every dollar you earn, you pay into the payroll tax. But think about that other 5 percent that's making more than $109,000 a year. Warren Buffett, he pays the payroll tax on the first $109,000 he makes, and then for the other $10 billion -- (laughter) -- he doesn't pay payroll tax.
So -- yes, somebody said, "What?" (Laughter.) Yes, that's right. That's the way it works.
So what we've said is, well, don't we -- doesn't it make sense to maybe have that payroll tax cut off at a higher level, or have people -- maybe you hold people harmless till they make $250,000 a year, but between $250,000 and a million or something, they start paying payroll tax again -- just to make sure that the fund overall is solvent.
So that would just be one example. That's not the only way of fixing it, but if you made a slight adjustment like that, then Social Security would be there well into the future and it would be fine. All right? (Applause.)
http://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/remarks-president-town-hall-meeting-henderson-nevada
56 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Manny will be hanging onto that same branch unitl Obama leaves office in 2016.
JoePhilly
Aug 2012
#8
President Obama Weekly Address August 13th, 2010: Honoring Social Security, Not Privatizing It
freshwest
Aug 2012
#20
Yet when he actually offered a plan in debt ceiling negotiations...
woo me with science
Aug 2012
#23
Obama Frustrated He Doesn’t Get Credit For Wanting to Cut Social Security and Medicare
jimmyd13
Aug 2012
#26
In all seriousness, this is how Third Way infiltration has allowed the one percent
woo me with science
Aug 2012
#34
Thanks Pro. You're the best at knocking down the Stein/Johnson/Anderson/Romney contingent....
Tarheel_Dem
Aug 2012
#35
Rationalize it any way you want. The fact remains, a bunch of people don't want to be called.....
Tarheel_Dem
Aug 2012
#39
Those polls were from a couple of years ago. Anything more recent? I never said "people....
Tarheel_Dem
Aug 2012
#54