Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Prediction [View all]john657
(1,058 posts)56. He's being accused of a very serious crime,
the presumption of innocence is sacrosanct in our society.
Do you know for certain if he did it?
If so, how do you know beyond a reasonable doubt that he did do it?
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
83 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Even if they lose the Senate in the midterms they still have the lame duck session
ooky
Sep 2018
#14
I tend to agree, but I'd like another even mini bombshell. I've only JUST heard a journo ask
OnDoutside
Sep 2018
#10
I stand by mine...we are looking at whether someone is fit to serve in a lifetime
Demsrule86
Sep 2018
#79
Unless there's corraboration or other women come forward with similiar, I think he gets confirmed
Kaleva
Sep 2018
#61
This isn't a legal case. So it's not corroboration, if Senators say it's not.
Honeycombe8
Sep 2018
#70