Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: WTF is wrong with Democrats that want to cut Social Security and/or Medicare? [View all]Octafish
(55,745 posts)99. Rnablers.
What truth does to some people is small compared to real property, especially cash.
Enablers
The Central Role of Faux Republicans in the Anatomy of Decline
by FRANKLIN C. SPINNEY
Gaeta, Italia.
CounterPunch
Readers beware; what follows is a biased book review. The author Mike Lofgren (bio) is a very close friend of mine, and, as some of you may may already know, I have been flogging his important new book, The Party Is Over: How Republicans Went Crazy, Democrats Became Useless, and the Middle Class Got Shafted. Mike is a conservative of the now forgotten old school, more at home with the likes of Robert Taft, Eisenhower, and Lincoln than right wing ideologues like Newt Gingrich or plutocratic highway robbers like Mitt Romney.
Casual readers of Lofgrens aptly titled book may well conclude that he is harder on Republicans than Democrats. In a technical sense this is true. Having served on the Republican staffs of the House and Senate Budget Committees, he was in a much better position to observe and understand their hijinks than those of the Democrats. So, it is not at all surprising that his book has more detail describing how the ideological Republican crazies created the current political-economic mess that is poisoning our culture and wrecking our economy. But it would be a great mistake to conclude that Mike is arguing that the Republicans are THE culprits. This book is about how the Republicans and Democrats worked together to sell out the middle class.
The author is a modest, unassuming individual, who at first glance would appear unlikely to write such a book. He never sought the kleig lights. He never hung out with the gucci shoe crowd to pave his way into high paying lobbying job on K Street. Lunch for Lofgren was not at the Prime Rib or Capital Hill Club, but a simple sandwich in a brown bag. This modesty of life style and demeanor hides a principled intellectual, who has the character to go where his reasoning and observation take him. And a pen in Lofgrens deft hands, combined with his deep understanding of political history and acid sense of humor, becomes a sharp, deeply penetrating harpoon aimed at the heart of his subject. In addition to harpooning the bloated degenerate Republican whale, Mike harpoons the Democrats by demonstrating subtly, yet persuasively, how their growing uselessness arose out of an enervating sense of entitlement to power.
That sense of entitlement mutated Democrats into what we in the Pentagon would call THE ENABLERS of Republicans. The Democratic enablers unwittingly played a crucial role in the demolition of the American dream, not unlike that played by infiltration troops in blitzkrieg. Infiltration troops soften up the front by wiggling through defenses to create holes and weak areas for the tanks to roar thru and reap chaos and destruction in the enemys rear area. Only in this case, the rear area being ruined is the American middle class and the role of tanks is taken up by the flow money supplied by the oligarchs who feather their nests by buying Democrats as well as Republicans in one seamless auction.
Put bluntly, to protect their sense hereditary entitlement to the power bequeathed by the coattails of FDR and the New Deal, the Democrats abandoned their progressive heritage and moved to Wall Street, Big Pharma, Defense, etc., insensibly becoming faux Republicans. If you doubt this, look at the enervating, quasi-neoliberal ramblings of the self-inflating Democratic Leadership Council (DLC) or the cynical triangulations and warmongerings of Messrs. Clinton and Obama. Their abdication of progressive principles gave Republican crazies more room to get even crazier, and together the faux Republicans and the real crazy Republicans reinforced each other to create a rightward shift in the American political dynamic that unleashed the evolution of a new gilded age, together with the re-emergence of a plutocracy that Russian oligarchs would envy. And this happened in a remarkably short time of 30 to 40 years.
CONTINUED...
http://www.counterpunch.org/2012/08/10/the-central-role-of-faux-republicans-in-the-anatomy-of-decline/
FDR HST JFK...
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
328 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
WTF is wrong with Democrats that want to cut Social Security and/or Medicare? [View all]
MannyGoldstein
Aug 2012
OP
Fourthed. I wonder how many of them were Reagan Democrats, or former Moderate Republicans?
sabrina 1
Aug 2012
#245
Please see #88, below. In 1993, Bill Clinton reduced Social Security benefits by increasing the
AnotherMcIntosh
Aug 2012
#91
Yes. Thanks to Clinton, Social Security is means-tested in that those who receive.
JDPriestly
Aug 2012
#104
I'll point a finger at him: He's a Third Way Democrat and, if I'm not mistaken,
whathehell
Aug 2012
#303
Umm, they're Democrats, all right. They, like our country, have rushed to the right.
SusanaMontana41
Aug 2012
#214
The best way to get rid of fraud from Medicare is to get rid of the 'fraudsters' altogether.
sabrina 1
Aug 2012
#262
If that was all that *both* parties are considering there would not be a problem
newthinking
Aug 2012
#199
There is no Medicare Fraud. Patients are not committing Fraud, Medicare is not committing
sabrina 1
Aug 2012
#264
I think the original post is not amount Dems supporting the Ryan budget, but about supporting a
limpyhobbler
Aug 2012
#21
They have been pushing that meme ever since, and are still today, it is the PLAN
Dragonfli
Aug 2012
#48
July 2012 3 Way says "entitlements" such as SS are squeezing investments and need "reform"
jtuck004
Aug 2012
#108
It is not bullshit, else you could refute it, lame man love is what it is....
Dragonfli
Aug 2012
#42
That is the simple math of it, yes. But we are supposed to applaud this Republican ideology because
Dragonfli
Aug 2012
#33
So Obama called Romney and got him to pick Ryan, so that when Obama wins, Obama can carry
JoePhilly
Aug 2012
#6
I notice you provided no link to who these 3rd way people were who were thrilled Romney
JoePhilly
Aug 2012
#17
You are desperately trying to distract from Ryan and project his budget on to Democrats
emulatorloo
Aug 2012
#209
Review your OP. Create Strawman Democrat. Project Ryan Plan onto Strawman Democrat
emulatorloo
Aug 2012
#244
You prefer ignorance perhaps, but a quick perusal of the third way site will prove Manny correct
Dragonfli
Aug 2012
#27
In his defense, I think many use that term without really thinking what it means.
sweetloukillbot
Aug 2012
#84
"Whatever"...Yeah, that about sums up the amount of consideration anyone but men, gay or straight
whathehell
Aug 2012
#305
No, that is inaccurate. Cutting costs without cutting funding is a way to get more benefit from
Bluenorthwest
Aug 2012
#134
Just the opposite, if we followed other countries direction and expanded Medicare to all
suffragette
Aug 2012
#193
Yes, the solution is contained within the examples of the systems and results
suffragette
Aug 2012
#327
Watch what you say, Manny. Before long you'll be accused of demanding Democrats march in lock-step!
Zalatix
Aug 2012
#11
Ask Manny to name the Dems who used the Ryan selection to call for cuts on SS today.
JoePhilly
Aug 2012
#25
Thanks to Romney's Hail Mary pick for his ticket, again we're seeing the Third Way types out in forc
spanone
Aug 2012
#37
What reporters? We used to have reporters. Now we have narcissistic stenographers who want their
AnotherMcIntosh
Aug 2012
#94
Narcissistic stenographers who want their participation to be more important than objective facts.
laundry_queen
Aug 2012
#295
Good post... If one needs to be reminded that social security is not the problem that is destroying
midnight
Aug 2012
#50
It's so early in the election season for 'divide and conquer" but I'm sure seeing it a lot lately..
progressivebydesign
Aug 2012
#52
If you are a Canadian who is ineligible to vote in American elections, why do you care and why
AnotherMcIntosh
Aug 2012
#96
It is not funny Sid. You are here advocating cuts in a nation that is not your own.
Bluenorthwest
Aug 2012
#137
I have an internatinonal life, and friends in many, many countries. We all discuss politics
Bluenorthwest
Aug 2012
#142
Canada must have Medicare or something better. That's why they are always rolling on the floor
Autumn
Aug 2012
#149
Reform attempts have gone on longer than 4 years. You might not be aware of that.
Autumn
Aug 2012
#183
My kind of thinking is more prevalent here in the USA than what you would think.
Autumn
Aug 2012
#195
what would be your answer to Obama successfully passing a full universal care program you want?
Whisp
Aug 2012
#200
Why do I think the US is so far behind on this basic human right? Simple, our politicians
Autumn
Aug 2012
#215
there are a lot of people that are realizing that yes, health care has been reformed
Whisp
Aug 2012
#228
They don't hate it. They got what they wanted when got the mandate. This plan saved the
sabrina 1
Aug 2012
#288
44,000 Americans die each year in the US for lack of HC, including those who have 'Coverage'
sabrina 1
Aug 2012
#287
No, your friend Sid is highly amused by the frustration of those who would like to stop
sabrina 1
Aug 2012
#290
"Cool your jets," followed by "I can understand your pain and frustration,"
woo me with science
Aug 2012
#310
Thank you wmws. I didn't really expect it to have any impact at all on certain people, but for those
sabrina 1
Aug 2012
#315
Many have bought into the idea that there will be no Social Security/Medicare when they get old
jwirr
Aug 2012
#72
Please tell us what to do about the fact that Medicare has evolved as THE adjunct to for-profit care
patrice
Aug 2012
#76
Patrice...you are on the right track..the Ontario health Care plan for seniors.is a good basic plan
nenagh
Aug 2012
#87
This is a hard thing to talk about here, because there are those who put their political
patrice
Aug 2012
#177
Enemies with benefits. We became the enemy, displaced them from Wall St,and that drives them crazy.
leveymg
Aug 2012
#141
Bill Clinton reduced Social Security benefits by signing tax legislation which made 85% of
AnotherMcIntosh
Aug 2012
#88
Reagan began the taxation of benefits in 1983, following the advice of 'the Greenspan Commission'
Bluenorthwest
Aug 2012
#140
The guy who wants to liquidate Social Security gets the republican nod for VP today
bhikkhu
Aug 2012
#90
That's what Manny does. Fabricates strawmen Dems, ignores real Republican threats and politicies.
emulatorloo
Aug 2012
#168
+1. not only that, but benefits have *already* been cut multiple times subrosa.
HiPointDem
Aug 2012
#115
Social security is not an entitlement, it is an annuity that we have paid into. Calling it,
still_one
Aug 2012
#109
that's why it *is* an entitlement. we paid in & we're entitled to it. it's on the dems that they
HiPointDem
Aug 2012
#114
Not conspiracy theories but rather the clear meaning of the President's own words.
eomer
Aug 2012
#144
What he has done is exactly what I posted - promoted cutting Social Security benefits.
eomer
Aug 2012
#298
Briefing room word games: What's a 'slash' versus a 'cut' in Social Security
MannyGoldstein
Aug 2012
#138
You don't support the Chained CPI, seriously, say it is not so. This IS DU after all.
sabrina 1
Aug 2012
#275
No, what's insane is brazen support for cutting SS on a Democratic board. nt
woo me with science
Aug 2012
#318
K&R 17% that still leaves tens of millions of people with no regular access,
Egalitarian Thug
Aug 2012
#129
It's all over the very front page of the Third Way website right now. The front page.
Zorra
Aug 2012
#201
1) You created a Strawman Democrat 2) You attempt to misdirect from Ryan 3) You blame Democrats for
emulatorloo
Aug 2012
#162
I wonder if woo would ever tell us about her job & benefits. It's easy to say burn it all down
patrice
Aug 2012
#178
What's underlying this entire discussion is a desperate attempt to distract from the Ryan Plan
emulatorloo
Aug 2012
#182
Thank you! For-profit treatment modalities that get the worst results for the highest prices are
patrice
Aug 2012
#204
I have seen some elders off. Have also been around a few cancer patients. & Taught high
patrice
Aug 2012
#216
It is incumbent upon all of us who care about Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid to call on
Citizen Worker
Aug 2012
#165
Talking point repetition. 3rd Way could be anything. Bigotry against it is EXCLUSIONARY, tell us
patrice
Aug 2012
#213
Why do you charaterize protecting ground-gained as silencing? Why don't you entertain the hypothesis
patrice
Aug 2012
#230
BTW, I prefer Neo-Liberals or DLC for what you are referring to, because dialectics CAN be a good
patrice
Aug 2012
#233
Are you denying that the Democratic Party has moved right and now represents "moderates"?
Tierra_y_Libertad
Aug 2012
#246
Nothing very anarchic in any of that. All QUITE predictable. A bunch of us are living in deep RED
patrice
Aug 2012
#254
The biggest problem with Medicare is the projected increasing costs for chronic diseases like
andym
Aug 2012
#252
The DLC was completely successful in shifting the Democratic Party to the right.
NorthCarolina
Aug 2012
#265