Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

bettyellen

(47,209 posts)
31. Don't be baited off topic. It's all they'be been trying to do all week.
Wed Sep 26, 2018, 10:19 PM
Sep 2018

We have many credible collaborated witness statements. That is the focus.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

They could be a bad distraction this week. We have corroborated statements- focus! bettyellen Sep 2018 #1
My point is she didn't have that opinion about the anonymous allegations... brush Sep 2018 #7
Al Franken, also a distraction this week. Let's not have the pity parties this particular week. bettyellen Sep 2018 #17
Fair enough, but she of all people should not be talking about anonymous... brush Sep 2018 #21
Don't be baited off topic. It's all they'be been trying to do all week. bettyellen Sep 2018 #31
I'm not baited. Just the irony is so strong of her discounting anonymous sources... brush Sep 2018 #34
She's trying to get her fellow senators to focus on the concrete right now- you are not the audience bettyellen Sep 2018 #39
I get your point but you don't seem to get the irony of her and anonymous... brush Sep 2018 #41
I get it, but it's pointless- even harmful- to disrupt her working her fellow senators as she is bettyellen Sep 2018 #45
Betty, it's just a discussion board. Lotsa topics. Even Bruckner pops up from time to time. pangaia Sep 2018 #55
Honestly, WRers troll here for anti Dem memes from Dem. many of us tweet too. This is exactly the bettyellen Sep 2018 #63
100% right. H2O Man Sep 2018 #53
They could be a set up Kaleva Sep 2018 #2
She sang a different tune with Franken. guillaumeb Sep 2018 #3
THIS Ferrets are Cool Sep 2018 #5
She sings the song she thinks sounds best for her. I will never forgive her, although I SUPPORT rzemanfl Sep 2018 #9
Does seem a bit contradictory. InAbLuEsTaTe Sep 2018 #19
Does seem a bit contradictory. LenaBaby61 Sep 2018 #26
Message auto-removed Name removed Sep 2018 #27
If it's Wednesday, Democrats are busy pulling the rug out from under each other flibbitygiblets Sep 2018 #33
She said the anonymous allegations... sheshe2 Sep 2018 #36
No, several were anonymous. brush Sep 2018 #50
Message auto-removed Name removed Sep 2018 #52
Some anonymous, right? The first one, Tweeden wasn't but also proved to not be credible. brush Sep 2018 #54
Message auto-removed Name removed Sep 2018 #56
You ignore the allegations Nevernose Sep 2018 #57
Message auto-removed Name removed Sep 2018 #58
Message auto-removed Name removed Sep 2018 #59
Message auto-removed Name removed Sep 2018 #60
And open accusations are treated more credibly? guillaumeb Sep 2018 #67
GOP set up. Iliyah Sep 2018 #4
One of them has already recanted. john657 Sep 2018 #6
There's debate on if that recant is real. Kaleva Sep 2018 #12
Having trouble following the shitstorm that serial rapist KKKavanaugh has left in his wake. InAbLuEsTaTe Sep 2018 #22
What is that from? brush Sep 2018 #13
Accuser #5, the alleged rape on the ship in RI. n/t john657 Sep 2018 #29
The accuser who allegedly beat up the rapists. Not the woman who was raped. Nevilledog Sep 2018 #61
I personally think it's a repub dirty trick to try to throw us john657 Sep 2018 #62
+1 uponit7771 Sep 2018 #64
It definitely has a different flavor. Nevilledog Sep 2018 #66
If you treat anonymous accusations like the accusations with names, faces, and testimony sworn RockRaven Sep 2018 #8
She didn't feel that way about the anonymous allegations against Franken. brush Sep 2018 #15
+1000. N/T john657 Sep 2018 #30
And DUers didn't feel the same way about named allegations against Franken mythology Sep 2018 #47
Not getting it. She of all people should avoid even talking about anonymous sources. brush Sep 2018 #49
Message auto-removed Name removed Sep 2018 #51
Because they are a set up! manor321 Sep 2018 #10
Missing the point. See her positon on anonymous allegations against Franken. brush Sep 2018 #18
The non-anonymous allegations should be sufficient for a full and thorough investigation gratuitous Sep 2018 #11
Fakes Dream Girl Sep 2018 #14
Coloradans (including myself) are waiting patiently until 2020 idcdu Sep 2018 #23
I think they need to be very careful with anonymous allegations, The Velveteen Ocelot Sep 2018 #16
Franken's accusers were anonymous? I thought they were all named. nt FromTheAshes Sep 2018 #25
No. Several were anonymous. The Velveteen Ocelot Sep 2018 #28
Smelling a Republican rat? C_U_L8R Sep 2018 #20
She is absolutely right. Anonymous has absolutely no backing, and runs a very real risk of being a still_one Sep 2018 #24
She finally figured that out. Too late for Al Franken though. See the difference? brush Sep 2018 #32
The allegations that pushed her to demand that Franken resign came from three Blue_true Sep 2018 #42
I don't know what her logic is, and while I agree that Al Franken was railroaded, Al choose for the still_one Sep 2018 #43
I know what the focus is but she of all people should not be talking about... brush Sep 2018 #44
I realize you know the score brush still_one Sep 2018 #46
I'd rather someone other than Gillebrand makes the case. dem4decades Sep 2018 #35
So would I. She doesn't have the best record on these kinds of thing. smirkymonkey Sep 2018 #40
+1 uponit7771 Sep 2018 #65
I've been drinking, this can't possibly be true njhoneybadger Sep 2018 #37
What else did she say? njhoneybadger Sep 2018 #38
I agree - especially as there are three that are not anonymous karynnj Sep 2018 #48
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Gillebrand is now on CNN/...»Reply #31