Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Fullduplexxx

(8,612 posts)
24. Here you go
Thu Sep 27, 2018, 09:26 AM
Sep 2018

The justices decided to hear the case one day after Kennedy announced his retirement

A Supreme Court Case Could Liberate Trump to Pardon His Associates 
Gamble v. United States isn’t related to the Russia investigation. But the outcome—which one senior Republican senator has tried to influence—could still have consequences for the probe. 
https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2018/09/trump-pardon-orrin-hatch-supreme-court/571285/ 

A key Republican senator has quietly weighed in on an upcoming Supreme Court case that could have important consequences for Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s Russia investigation. 

The Utah lawmaker Orrin Hatch, who sits on the Senate Judiciary Committee, filed a 44-page amicus brief earlier this month in Gamble v. United States, a case that will consider whether the dual-sovereignty doctrine should be put to rest. The 150-year-old exception to the Fifth Amendment’s double-jeopardy clause allows state and federal courts to prosecute the same person for the same criminal offense. According to the brief he filed on September 11, Hatch believes the doctrine should be overturned. “The extensive federalization of criminal law has rendered ineffective the federalist underpinnings of the dual sovereignty doctrine,” his brief reads. “And its persistence impairs full realization of the Double Jeopardy Clause’s liberty protections.” 

Within the context of the Mueller probe, legal observers have seen the dual-sovereignty doctrine as a check on President Donald Trump’s power: It could discourage him from trying to shut down the Mueller investigation or pardon anyone caught up in the probe, because the pardon wouldn’t be applied to state charges. Under settled law, if Trump were to pardon his former campaign chairman Paul Manafort, for example—he was convicted last month in federal court on eight counts of tax and bank fraud—both New York and Virginia state prosecutors could still charge him for any crimes that violated their respective laws. (Both states have a double-jeopardy law that bars secondary state prosecutions for committing “the same act,” but there are important exceptions, as the Fordham University School of Law professor Jed Shugerman has noted.) If the dual-sovereignty doctrine were tossed, as Hatch wants, then Trump’s pardon could theoretically protect Manafort from state action. 

If Trump were to shut down the investigation or pardon his associates, “the escape hatch, then, is for cases to be farmed out or picked up by state-level attorneys general, who cannot be shut down by Trump and who generally—but with some existing limits—can charge state crimes even after a federal pardon,” explained Elie Honig, a former assistant U.S. attorney in New Jersey. “If Hatch gets his way, however, a federal pardon would essentially block a subsequent state-level prosecution.” 

<<snip>> 

But while Hatch has earned his bona fides in the arena of criminal-justice reform, the timing of his filing is nevertheless significant. For months, the Gamble case has been analyzed through the lens of the Mueller investigation, and Brett Kavanaugh, Trump’s nominee to replace the retired Supreme Court Justice Anthony Kennedy, could be on the bench by the time the Court reconvenes this fall. The justices decided to hear the case one day after Kennedy announced his retirement.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

I hope and pray you are right but fear you are wrong. DemocratSinceBirth Sep 2018 #1
I think that they will force an up or down vote. irresistable Sep 2018 #2
Some GOPers are so disgusted with the process that an up or down vote would be a relief, Eyeball_Kid Sep 2018 #13
Hope is different than think. The cons fall in line . The cons have a case Fullduplexxx Sep 2018 #3
THAT is exactly what I was going to post. Glad I saw your post 1st. pangaia Sep 2018 #8
Yes that is why the cons refer to this as coming at the 11th hour Fullduplexxx Sep 2018 #22
That is wrong. Gamble v. US does no such thing. Nevilledog Sep 2018 #14
Here you go Fullduplexxx Sep 2018 #24
That is an incorrect analysis. Nevilledog Sep 2018 #27
I think 3 or 4 Republicans will rise to the occasion... hogcard1964 Sep 2018 #4
we will never know how many lapfog_1 Sep 2018 #5
Well, I fear the worst but one R, Freestate_MD Sep 2018 #6
NOTHING will keep them from putting this accused rapist on the highest court of the land. Zoonart Sep 2018 #7
YUP. That is the bottom line. pangaia Sep 2018 #10
Gamble v u.s. Fullduplexxx Sep 2018 #25
I don't see it. BlueTsunami2018 Sep 2018 #9
They don't even have the courage to ask questions themselves . . . . hatrack Sep 2018 #11
Obviously, I am in the minority here... kentuck Sep 2018 #12
I cling to hope too. Trump opened up Pandora's Box, WePurrsevere Sep 2018 #17
I had the same thought this morning when I was riding my unicorn to the pot of gold at the rzemanfl Sep 2018 #15
well said rzemanfl kpete Sep 2018 #19
Thank you. I have grown tired of just calling Repukes lying motherfuckers. n/t rzemanfl Sep 2018 #20
That's what Obama said for eight years BeyondGeography Sep 2018 #16
trump offered a retreat by saying now perhaps we should listen to what ford has to say. The issue beachbum bob Sep 2018 #18
If there were to be such a thing... Cracklin Charlie Sep 2018 #21
redumbliCONS only care about their American (and maybe russian) democratisphere Sep 2018 #23
I hope you are right but would decline to bet that way JHB Sep 2018 #26
Impeachment will need 66 votes in Senate delisen Sep 2018 #28
It's more likely they will put their own careers over everything else Major Nikon Sep 2018 #29
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»I think 3 or 4 Republican...»Reply #24