Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: If a) Manchin votes to confirm Kav AND b) Dems take Senate by 2 seats [View all]bearsfootball516
(6,707 posts)11. No. The only way he votes yes is if Democrats already know he's getting 51 votes.
In that case, he's just saving his skin.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
128 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
If a) Manchin votes to confirm Kav AND b) Dems take Senate by 2 seats [View all]
RockRaven
Sep 2018
OP
absolutely. But let's see what comes out of the Manchin/Flake/Collins/Murkowski meeting. n/t
CincyDem
Sep 2018
#1
No he votes with us most of the time...if the GOP votes for Kavanaugh, it doesn't matter.
Demsrule86
Sep 2018
#4
And? 61 % votes with us is way better than the high 90's for most GOP types.
Demsrule86
Sep 2018
#25
I put the wrong figures in and have corrected...many of those votes were passing with
Demsrule86
Sep 2018
#31
The point is he saved the ACA by voting to keep it...it would have gone down otherwise.
Demsrule86
Sep 2018
#82
If he cannot stand with his party on the most important votes like these, he's not a Dem.
onecaliberal
Sep 2018
#24
People are so dense sometimes, and don't understand that NUMBERS matter. They determine who
still_one
Sep 2018
#15
Sure all those 'principled' voters who turned up their noses at Gore and later Clinton
Demsrule86
Sep 2018
#33
Really. This is esstially what Jill Stein, Susan Sarandon, and those other self-identified
still_one
Sep 2018
#38
That is the same BS those self-identified progressives who refused to vote for the Democratic
still_one
Sep 2018
#90
The answer to your question isn't taking punitive action against a Democrat AFTER he has been
still_one
Sep 2018
#112
I don't care what people say, that is the way change is done in our political system. I will
still_one
Sep 2018
#119
Then the impeachment hearings in the Dem House will have to uncover such TREASON
Volaris
Sep 2018
#35
No. The only way he votes yes is if Democrats already know he's getting 51 votes.
bearsfootball516
Sep 2018
#11
Really? well when they manage to repeal all healthcare and make the age of social security 70
Demsrule86
Sep 2018
#37
This is essentially what Jill Stein, Susan Sarandon, and those other self-identifed Democrats who
still_one
Sep 2018
#16
What percentage of the time do you think a Republican would vote with Trump? n/t
PoliticAverse
Sep 2018
#104
I've never been a big fan of cutting off one's nose to spite their face. Doesn't seem bright to me.
WillowTree
Sep 2018
#57
Voting for a Republican lifetime appointment is bullshit. If he can't explain, as a Democrat, why he
jalan48
Sep 2018
#64
Sorry, this a lifetime appointment. I can't give him a pass on this one. How do we know he doesn't
jalan48
Sep 2018
#97
Who then, represents the Democrats in WVA who oppose Kav? Are both sides the same for them?
jalan48
Sep 2018
#114
It's refreshing that people recognize your greater wisdom when they see it. I appreciate that.
George II
Sep 2018
#124
Cause he is often been counted on to vote with them and used to attack other Democrats.
rogue emissary
Sep 2018
#87
Yes, that's the practicality of the votes. On top of that, I prefer 61% to 100%....
George II
Sep 2018
#100
If it was me I would threaten any Democrat who considers voting to confirm with their careers.
liberalnarb
Sep 2018
#96
Not worth very much if you vote with the Rs on something this important. nt
liberalnarb
Sep 2018
#120
I think it appears clear that without an investigation the vote will fail at this point.
Tiggeroshii
Sep 2018
#128