Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Ted Lieu: If Brett Kavanaugh can be this angry on national TV... [View all]Stare Decisis
(229 posts)76. I have a concern about a detail of Kavanaugh's testimony
Hi. I wanted to point out something-Dr. Ford repeatedly said that she could name three people other than Kavanaugh at the gathering-, Leland, Mike Judge, and a boy named P.J.-most importantly, another boy whose name she did not know. Yet Kavanaugh some ten times mentioned that FOUR witnesses refuted it. How would he know who the fourth (person) boy was?
Meaning, how would he know there could be four signed statements given to the SJC-and how would the SJC even know there were four to secure, if it never happened, and the accuser could not name more than three?
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
90 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
He appeared to me to be a volcano that could burst at the slilghtest provocation.
olegramps
Sep 2018
#85
Yeah. Really. This is the best they could come up with, cause he's a tRump insurance policy. . . .nt
Bernardo de La Paz
Sep 2018
#62
For someone reported to be such a heavy drinker, I'm not noticing hands shaking
flibbitygiblets
Sep 2018
#7
No, but you see...he is the victim right...? (don't know how to do the irony emoji..)
KSNY
Sep 2018
#25
RepubliCONs are held and swayed by emotions. Logic of Ford risking everything & Kavanaugh nothing by
Bernardo de La Paz
Sep 2018
#61
All I can say is if it were me, I'd also be livid. But I'm not saying he's innocent either.
7962
Sep 2018
#57
Hidden-anger people make for angry drunks. Happy people make happy drunks.
Bernardo de La Paz
Sep 2018
#59
Scotus so angry he can't deliberate with other judges. Period. Clearly unqualified.
lindysalsagal
Sep 2018
#68
Showed hatred of Clintons, pure partisan hack, but we knew that he was filth
Eliot Rosewater
Sep 2018
#72