Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

(64,160 posts)

5. He can, but not for the House committee...

Sat Sep 29, 2018, 10:01 AM

Sep 2018

They have their own power of subpoena, that the Repubs chose not to invoke.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

14 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Adam Schiff: They call this transparency [View all] dajoki Sep 2018 OP

AGREE! in2herbs Sep 2018 #6

Absolutely Pepsidog Sep 2018 #9

All that testimony, nothing burger to feed Fox. Sad! Fred Sanders Sep 2018 #2

Why can't Mueller subpoena that? dem4decades Sep 2018 #3

He can, but not for the House committee... Wounded Bear Sep 2018 #5

But can't he do it for his investagtion? dajoki Sep 2018 #12

Yes, of course, assuming he can prove relevance... Wounded Bear Sep 2018 #13

I think it is relevant n/t dajoki Sep 2018 #14

Can't wait til he's the chair of that committee... Wounded Bear Sep 2018 #4

Yep. calimary Sep 2018 #7

Now we'll see some actual 'angry Democrats.' pecosbob Sep 2018 #8

can they do same with this limited kavanaugh 'investigation'? certainot Sep 2018 #10

Republicans are showing us how DEMs are permitted to treat them. nt NCjack Sep 2018 #11